Re: [aerogear-dev] Aerogear-Controller-Demo Functional Test

Tolis, thank you for driving this! Now a few comments: Having a parent pom is not necessary. As we agreed during JDF quickstarts discussions, the best way to handle example + test scenario that is to have no parent at all. Users will not get confused while importing into JBDS. Power users willing to see how to test that will simply import a second project. Test project itself is packaged in aerogear-controller-demo/functional-test so it won't disturb users with two directories per project. Karel On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 22:31:51 +0100 Apostolos Emmanouilidis <aemmanou(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted to inform you that I've added a functional test for the > Aerogear-Controller-Demo in the GitHub repo [1] > > I created a parent POM which contains 2 modules, the first module is the > aerogear-controller-demo and the second one is the > aerogear-controller-demo-ftest. The aerogear-controller-demo version is > the latest one until the moment I'm writing this e-mail. The only change > which has been done in the aerogear-controller-demo is that the staging > repository was added inside the POM xml since I didn't want to modify my > maven settings.xml. But we can change it.. > > The functional test project contains 2 profiles: > > 1. arq-jbossas-managed-7 > 2. arq-jbossas-remote > > > By default the first profile is active. > > Inside the AerogearControllerDemoTestCase there is a TODO task which > states: 'TODO: uncomment when > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-1005 is fixed'. The relevant > commented code tests the above JIRA issue. > > Any comment, enhancement, improvement is highly appreciated :) > > Thank you, > Tolis Emmanouilidis > > [1] https://github.com/tolis-e/aerogear-controller-demo.git