Re: [aerogear-dev] Sync data model comparison

On Thu 09 Jan 2014 11:06:26 AM EST, Bruno Oliveira wrote: > Makes sense, I think that’s a great start is to integrate your idea against what Dan already did to the server, into this way we can start to put together our puzzle. Yup, just got Danbev's server up and running. I'll see what happens :) > > -- > abstractj > > On January 9, 2014 at 12:37:19 PM, Summers Pittman (supittma(a)redhat.com) wrote: >>> One of the things about using a provider that I don't like is the >> "using a provider". One of the things I hope sync to become is a >> collection of tools, utilities, and patterns that our developers >> can >> adopt to add in sync to their web apps without having to add extra >> services like couch, pouch, etc and without having to significantly >> alter their application. >> >> HOWEVER, I am still reading up on / playing with Couch so don't >> count >> me out on thinking it is a good way to go forward; I just havn't seen >> any code to get the feel for how it will interact inside of AeroGear. >> It is entirely possible that it will be / can be one of the tools >> that >> we use for some of our sync solution. > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev