Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
:)
well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)
Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in
a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version
-M
thoughts?
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hi,
>
> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>
>
> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>
> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
> you would call it).
>
> thoughts?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf