Re: [aerogear-dev] [Aerogear Pipeline] Support for nested endpoints

Regarding on how we pass the resource, do we want to establish an convention here about the leading "/" ? i.e "/teams", should we omit the "/" and just pass "teams" ? If we take a look a the current impl in JS for passing an id, we have the convention of no leading "/" as this one is added implicitly by the library. More generally, I will start a new thread about convention for passing resources because I spotted some other cases where we are mixing stuff, remember : Keeping It Simple by Don't Repeating Yourself with Convention Over Configuration Seb On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: +1 for approach #1 And since approach #1 seems quite popular the Gist has been updated with the JS version of #1 https://gist.github.com/cvasilak/4a5f51b8d1ad9cc7f21b On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: +1 for approach #1. Nice write up on this Christos, thanks for that! On 10 April 2013 18:32, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: yeah - same here, :) +1 on proposal #1 On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: Approach #1 hands down -- qmx _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev