On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:05 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
Hi, Dave
thanks for the feedback
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 6:16 PM, David Martin <davmarti(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> For RHMAP 3/4, the Studio was originally part of a single jar/war
> (millicore). It did have a jsp for delivering the index.html (which
> wrote a bunch of inline javascript)
>
> The studio was then decoupled from the war file as a separate war
> (fh-studio). However, it still had an index.jsp, but called back to
> the 'core' to get some of the info needed for that.
>
> This was eventually refactored into a node.js express app (fh-ngui)
> and deployed completely separately. It still made calls back to the
> core to get some config/user info.
>
> The main benefit I found was the UI could be progressed at a faster
> pace as the local development tooling could be tailored better. (just
> run the UI server & hook up to an existing core somewhere)
> However, it introduced overhead with the addition of a new deployable
> component.
>
that's also some of the points. We already have the development moved over
to a different repo.
We currently just stick it's JAR (which might be silly) into the WAR.
>
> This was all in a pre-containers world, but it was migrated to a
> container world (on openshift).
> We never went as far as nginx serving static content, but I could see
> that as a logical progression.
> It would probably mean a smaller footprint overall.
>
cool. It's something I will include in the proposal (not done any
testings).
Currently I look removing some good parts of the WAR file for the push
delivery itself.
current approach, which I do like so far, is having each "network" run as
a java process, that wires the "send bits" (e.g. for iOS) togehter via
messaging (kafka).
Here is a metrics screenshot:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/157646/
35808591-9393ec6c-0a86-11e8-9b6f-f138fe0a5691.png
code is located here:
https://github.com/matzew/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/
8d01c771a0a89d1243534adef3a924ad284b3c41/push-agents/apns-
agent/src/main/java/org/aerogear/push/apns
It's borrowing some concenpts/code from core UPS. but is really no http
server - just a standard Main, which has a kafka consumer, plugged via ENVs.
I currently deploy to Openshift using the fabric8-maven-plugin (fmp), that
generates all all (docker file, k8s/oc yamls).
I will do the same for FCM.
Once that all is done, we have no "sending" code in the UPS, and we can
move than the UPS itself to WF-Swarm, for a migration to a simpler
develipment/deployment model (and perhaps some more modules in the longer
run)
Proposing:
* fcm-sender.jar (in container)
* apns-sender.jar (in container)
* UPS move to Swarm
* UI in nginx
>
> On 30 January 2018 at 19:40, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > right now, we have the static resources of the admin ui build to a JAR
> file
> > and a "node tgz". Currently, in the community, we use the bundled JAR
> and
> > deployed to the UPS WAR file. So far, so good
> >
> > For our modularization I was thinking at different options:
> >
> > * WildFly Swarm w/ just static (WAR) resources
> > * Node.js/Express app
> > * Ngnix container, just serviing the content
> >
> > I've tested 1) I was wondering if we might - for some better resource
> > utilization might just go w/ Ngnix, and deploy the static resources of
> the
> > admin UI to there?
> >
> > How do other think about breaking the UPS down to different
> technologies and
> > aspects?
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > [1]
https://github.com/aerogear/unifiedpush-admin-ui
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > github:
https://github.com/matzew
> > twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > "Aerogear" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an
> > email to aerogear+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
> > To post to this group, send email to aerogear(a)googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/aerogear/CAAg5f2Qi6Fwj5FPq
> -VdBEw3Ro_pq4FwqJpPiyGbmj0cEJrfv7Q%40mail.gmail.com.
> > For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>
> --
> David Martin
> Red Hat Mobile
> Twitter: @irldavem
> IRC: @irldavem (#aerogear)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Aerogear" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to aerogear+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to aerogear(a)googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/ms
> gid/aerogear/CADvBQ45yhH_-%2BZ2gKsU-agjv2ucngsgUgo66-dQ7Mdyo
>
MuDinw%40mail.gmail.com.
> For more options, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
github:
https://github.com/matzew
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf