Re: [aerogear-dev] Pagination Requirements Spec
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
standards++
Looks like we agreed on using the RFC 5988 for the linking.
I think we "just" need to decide on the actual values...
1) the standard uses "previous" and "next"
2) github API uses "prev" and "next"
For my taste I like the "previous" and "next"...
I am sure we could even prefix it... ag-previous/ag-next - not sure
this is really needed...
-- qmx
On 15/01/2013, at 07:26, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we've created the following gist[1] to specify our requirements for pagination.
We can discuss this on the mailing list and then update the doc as we go along. This will
later be turned into a page under the spec section of the site.
>
> Nothing has been decide yet even if it might read like it has in the document.
>
> [1] https://gist.github.com/4537431
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf