9:40 a.m.
Hi,
the first deliverable for "Push" is targeted to the 1.2.0 of the _umbrella_
AeroGear release.
However, starting the versioning, in AG-PUSH, with 1.2.0 is weird :)
Even a 1.0.0 feels weird to us.
What about something that indicates a certain strength, but also indicates
== "not yet 100% done"
What about starting with a 0.7.0 (or 0.8.0) version ?
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
10:36 a.m.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> What about starting with a 0.7.0 (or 0.8.0) version ?
What about starting with a 0.1.0 version?
:-) we feel a bit stronger than that :)
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
10:36 a.m.
On May 21, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> What about starting with a 0.7.0 (or 0.8.0) version ?
What about starting with a 0.1.0 version?
We talked about that but it implies that this isn't as far along as it actually is. I
would prefer something closer to 1.0 like 0.7 or 0.8
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:03 a.m.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:36:51AM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
On May 21, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me>
wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> What about starting with a 0.7.0 (or 0.8.0) version ?
> What about starting with a 0.1.0 version?
Any version 0.x for a new project
makes me smile, because it's how it is
supposed to be.
GO GO GO
--
qmx
11:05 a.m.
:))
0.7.0
or
0.8.0
? :)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:36:51AM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:
> On May 21, 2013, at 10:35 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 04:40:03PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> What about starting with a 0.7.0 (or 0.8.0) version ?
> > What about starting with a 0.1.0 version?
Any version 0.x for a new project makes me smile, because it's how it is
supposed to be.
GO GO GO
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
11:23 a.m.
How about 0.7.4-CR3-SNAPSHOT-WTF-UNNECESSARY-EXTRA-BS ?
:P
On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> :))
>
> 0.7.0
>
> or
>
> 0.8.0
>
> ? :)
Follow your heart (and check with Jay :P)
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:30 a.m.
In all seriousness, I would probably lean toward 0.8.0, for no other reason than it just
feels right. :)
On May 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
How about 0.7.4-CR3-SNAPSHOT-WTF-UNNECESSARY-EXTRA-BS ?
:P
On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> :))
>>
>> 0.7.0
>>
>> or
>>
>> 0.8.0
>>
>> ? :)
> Follow your heart (and check with Jay :P)
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:33 a.m.
+1 on 0.8.0
-M
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
In all seriousness, I would probably lean toward 0.8.0, for no other
reason than it just feels right. :)
On May 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
How about 0.7.4-CR3-SNAPSHOT-WTF-UNNECESSARY-EXTRA-BS ?
:P
On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
:))
0.7.0
or
0.8.0
? :)
Follow your heart (and check with Jay :P)
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
11:45 a.m.
On May 21, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1 on 0.8.0
+1
-M
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
In all seriousness, I would probably lean toward 0.8.0, for no other reason than it just
feels right. :)
On May 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> How about 0.7.4-CR3-SNAPSHOT-WTF-UNNECESSARY-EXTRA-BS ?
>
> :P
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>> :))
>>>
>>> 0.7.0
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> 0.8.0
>>>
>>> ? :)
>> Follow your heart (and check with Jay :P)
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:47 a.m.
+1
Den tisdagen den 21:e maj 2013 skrev Jay Balunas:
On May 21, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1 on 0.8.0
+1
-M
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com<javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'kris(a)redhat.com');>
> wrote:
> In all seriousness, I would probably lean toward 0.8.0, for no other
> reason than it just feels right. :)
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com<javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'kris(a)redhat.com');>>
> wrote:
>
> How about 0.7.4-CR3-SNAPSHOT-WTF-UNNECESSARY-EXTRA-BS ?
>
> :P
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me<javascript:_e({},
'cvml', 'qmx(a)qmx.me');>>
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> :))
>
> 0.7.0
>
> or
>
> 0.8.0
>
> ? :)
>
> Follow your heart (and check with Jay :P)
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org');>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org');>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org');>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org');>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:47 a.m.
+1
On May 21, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1
Den tisdagen den 21:e maj 2013 skrev Jay Balunas:
On May 21, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> +1 on 0.8.0
+1
>
> -M
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> In all seriousness, I would probably lean toward 0.8.0, for no other reason than it
just feels right. :)
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> How about 0.7.4-CR3-SNAPSHOT-WTF-UNNECESSARY-EXTRA-BS ?
>>
>> :P
>>
>> On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>> :))
>>>>
>>>> 0.7.0
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> 0.8.0
>>>>
>>>> ? :)
>>> Follow your heart (and check with Jay :P)
>>>
>>> --
>>> qmx
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
11:51 a.m.
Created versions:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH#selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plu...
basic idea:
*0.8.0 ===> 1.2.0 of the "Umbrella" AeroGear project (mid Aug.)
*0.9.0 ===> 1.3.0 of the "Umbrella" AeroGear project (mid Oct)
*1.0.0 ===> 1.4.0 of the "Umbrella" AeroGear project (mid Jan)
-Matthias
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui(a)redhat.com>wrote:
+1
On May 21, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
+1
Den tisdagen den 21:e maj 2013 skrev Jay Balunas:
>
> On May 21, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> +1 on 0.8.0
>
>
> +1
>
>
> -M
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> In all seriousness, I would probably lean toward 0.8.0, for no other
>> reason than it just feels right. :)
>>
>> On May 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Kris Borchers <kris(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> How about 0.7.4-CR3-SNAPSHOT-WTF-UNNECESSARY-EXTRA-BS ?
>>
>> :P
>>
>> On May 21, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:05:28PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>> :))
>>
>> 0.7.0
>>
>> or
>>
>> 0.8.0
>>
>> ? :)
>>
>> Follow your heart (and check with Jay :P)
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
4007
days inactive
4007
days old
13 comments
6 participants
participants (6)
-
Daniel Bevenius -
Douglas Campos -
Jay Balunas -
Kris Borchers -
Lucas Holmquist -
Matthias Wessendorf