-M
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
Looks like (see [2]) Square indicates to get rid of their own fork,
which is a good sign.
-M
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking at existing Java libs to push to Apple, I found java-apns (see
> [1]). The license (see recent thread) is BSD-ish, which should be
> fine.
>
> There one (little) issue, which I discovered when sending a (simple)
> patch to the project (see [2]). The project is a bit in-active, but
> not its community. There are some 'maintained' forks out there
> (including one by Square Inc).
> Ideally all the forks would be merged into one 'unified' version of
> the java-apns library. I raised that issue in [2] and other were
> talking about that too.
>
> Right now there is a (little) chance that we will join forces and this
> would also mean that there will be (frequently) release out on maven
> central.
>
> If you have any thoughts on this, let me know.
>
> Thanks!
> Matthias
>
> [1]
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns
> [2]
https://github.com/notnoop/java-apns/pull/83
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf