I've sent a PR for this:
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-webpush-server/pull/20
Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--
E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
wrote:
> >The only real reason at the moment would be to support the this Node.js
>> WebPush server implementation [1]. But it has not been updated since May
>> 2015 so I'm pretty sure it is not up to date with the current spec.
>>
>
> The version of Node.js WebPush server in master branch implements one of
> the first drafts of WebPush protocol. It also has a PR [2] which plans to
> support the same version of protocol as we are now. And they have an issue
> [3] to support ALPN. In this case we can tag our current state and go
> further just with ALPN.
>
> So, I add +1 to:
>
> >My vote is to remove NPN support for both the server and console.
>
>
> [2]
https://github.com/kitcambridge/node-webpush-server/pull/8/files
> [3]
https://github.com/kitcambridge/node-webpush-server/issues/7
>
>
> Best regards,
> Idel Pivnitskiy
> --
> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org>
wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:24 AM, Daniel Bevenius <
>> daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com
wrote:
>>
>>> >I just want to know and discuss why we support NPN in WebPush project.
>>> If I recall correctly this was due to that when we first started on the
>>> WebPush server (November 2014) we were still considering supporting Java
>>> 1.7 which required us to use NPN.
>>>
>>> >We may support it in "webpush-console" because it doesn't
use Java 8
>>> API. But do we really want to support deprecated protocol and API?
>>> The only real reason at the moment would be to support the this Node.js
>>> WebPush server implementation [1]. But it has not been updated since May
>>> 2015 so I'm pretty sure it is not up to date with the current spec.
>>>
>>
>> perhaps we can ask the guys, what's up there :)
>>
>>
>>>
>>> My vote is to remove NPN support for both the server and console.
>>>
>>
>> generally, +1 on this
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
https://github.com/kitcambridge/node-webpush-server
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23 February 2016 at 22:21, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
>>>
wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all!
>>>>
>>>> I just want to know and discuss why we support NPN in WebPush project.
>>>>
>>>> Jetty npn-boot works only with Java 7. But
>>>> "aerogear-webpush-server-netty" uses a lot of Java 8 API and
it's
>>>> impossible to compile it with javac 7.
>>>> We may support it in "webpush-console" because it doesn't
use Java 8
>>>> API. But do we really want to support deprecated protocol and API?
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Idel Pivnitskiy
>>>> --
>>>> E-mail: Idel.Pivnitskiy(a)gmail.com
>>>> Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://twitter.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>> GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy <
https://github.com/idelpivnitskiy>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog:
http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions:
http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter:
http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>