3:22 p.m.
Playing with the push server I see that some projects are using
org.aerogear instead of org.jboss.aerogear. Is this correct?
aerogear-unified-push-server
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
aerogear-push-quickstart-backend
Att,
Daniel Passos
3:24 p.m.
IMO the correct would be org.jboss.aerogear.* If not, it should be fixed.
Daniel Passos wrote:
Playing with the push server I see that some projects are using
org.aerogear instead of org.jboss.aerogear. Is this correct?
aerogear-unified-push-server
aerogear-unified-push-java-client
aerogear-push-quickstart-backend
Att,
Daniel Passos
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
3:30 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:22:03PM -0300, Daniel Passos wrote:
Playing with the push server I see that some projects are using
org.aerogear instead of org.jboss.aerogear. Is this correct?
it's wrong, the
agreed format is using org.jboss.aerogear unless
something changed recently that we don't know.
--
qmx
3:38 p.m.
Seems that some of us are going to have some refactoring fun ;)
Daniel, Could you open a jira (or jira for each project) so that we keep
track of that ?
Seb
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:22:03PM -0300, Daniel Passos wrote:
> Playing with the push server I see that some projects are using
> org.aerogear instead of org.jboss.aerogear. Is this correct?
it's wrong, the agreed format is using org.jboss.aerogear unless
something changed recently that we don't know.
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
4:10 p.m.
Done for the push server
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server/pull/4
Sebastien Blanc wrote:
Seems that some of us are going to have some refactoring fun ;)
Daniel, Could you open a jira (or jira for each project) so that we keep
track of that ?
Seb
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me
<mailto:qmx@qmx.me>> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:22:03PM -0300, Daniel Passos wrote:
> Playing with the push server I see that some projects are using
> org.aerogear instead of org.jboss.aerogear. Is this correct?
it's wrong, the agreed format is using org.jboss.aerogear unless
something changed recently that we don't know.
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
abstractj
4:11 p.m.
Done => https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-102
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Seems that some of us are going to have some refactoring fun ;)
Daniel, Could you open a jira (or jira for each project) so that we keep
track of that ?
Seb
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:22:03PM -0300, Daniel Passos wrote:
> > Playing with the push server I see that some projects are using
> > org.aerogear instead of org.jboss.aerogear. Is this correct?
> it's wrong, the agreed format is using org.jboss.aerogear unless
> something changed recently that we don't know.
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
3:51 p.m.
PR for aerogear-push-quickstart-backend
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstart-backend/pull/1
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Daniel Passos <daniel(a)passos.me> wrote:
Done => https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-102
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> Seems that some of us are going to have some refactoring fun ;)
> Daniel, Could you open a jira (or jira for each project) so that we keep
> track of that ?
> Seb
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:22:03PM -0300, Daniel Passos wrote:
>> > Playing with the push server I see that some projects are using
>> > org.aerogear instead of org.jboss.aerogear. Is this correct?
>> it's wrong, the agreed format is using org.jboss.aerogear unless
>> something changed recently that we don't know.
>>
>> --
>> qmx
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
4208
days inactive
4209
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Bruno Oliveira -
Daniel Passos -
Douglas Campos -
Sebastien Blanc