which makes impossible to replace GCM backend with mocked backend for
testing purposes. Other messaging provider libraries allow that.
So basically Karel you are saying that their library is unsuited for our
applications without some serious modification?
Right now in the Topics PR I have a branched, snipped, and (slightly)
refactored maven version. Feel free to give you feedback there.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hello Summers,
>> my concern would be that this repo is Ant based and not available in
>> Maven Central. So a fork would indeed be needed. Other problem is that the
>> lib does not support supplying backend server location -
> What do you mean?
>> but this is something a PR can fix. In the past, I believe that we
>> evaluated this library as an option as well
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com>
>>> Guys and gals,
>>> UPS is currently using a fork of Google's rest-client sample to
>>> communicate with Google's servers (See the previous thread UPS and
>>> com.ganyo:gcm-server for details**). This is an outdated fork from
>>> It is in fact very outdated. The rest client code, Message and Builder
>>> objects, Constant fields, and Sender code don't support all of the
>>> fields/errors/etc needed for GCM topics messaging. Additionally it uses a
>>> deprecated field in a few places. I've filed two* issues*** in the gcm
>>> project to reach out and begin work with them to resolve this in a more
>>> sane way. In the meanwhile we will probably have to patch and support our
>>> own fork of the library.
>>> Thoughts, comments, tomatoes?
>>> PS, this will probably bump XMPP support from aerogear-android-push 3.0
>>> and UPS 1.2. Please let me know if it should and i will pull those from
>>> the JIRA epics and we can reschedule them.
>>> * https://github.com/google/gcm/issues/84
>>> *** https://github.com/google/gcm/issues/85
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev mailing list