Hey Bruno, I wanted to take a look at this issue but I'm probably missing something obvious here:( I'm using your 'keycloak.js' branch and have updated and builtt keycloak locally, then built aerogear-unified-push-server and first deployed auth-server.war and then ag-push.war. When I then access UPS's admin console using http://localhost:8080/ag-push I the page looks like the screenshot I've attached, I'm not seeing any error in the server console or the browser console, and I'm not able to really do anything on this page, like click on the user for example. Let me know if there is some step that I've forgotten. Thanks, /Dan On 17 June 2014 00:06, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > Good morning peeps, > > First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for > dedicating > their time helping with Keycloak integration. > > I think we are almost done, this is the current branch: > https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js. > And now most > of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current logged > in user. > > Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need > to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages > now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak. If you try to > send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic > authentication form atm. > > If you have a better idea, I'm all ears. > > -- > > abstractj > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >

_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Bom Dia! On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > Good morning peeps, > > First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for > dedicating > their time helping with Keycloak integration. > Great to hear! :-) > > I think we are almost done, this is the current branch: > https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js. > And now most > of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current logged > in user. > > Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need > to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages > now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak. Is the reason here that the 'sending endpoint' is also accessed from the AdminUI, for the 'compose a push' feature? If it's really required I am OK with that. However, I'd prefer to avoid it, as changing the behaviour of one of our two HTTP_BASIC endpoints ('device registration' and 'sending') also requires changes/updates on the relevant client SDKs. Greetings, Matthias > If you try to > send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic > authentication form atm. > > If you have a better idea, I'm all ears. > > -- > > abstractj > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Btw, are we ready to merge keycloak.js branch into master and continue work there?

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas.fryc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Hey guys, > > I've did some stabilizations inside the Bruno's keycloak.js branch and > then rebased it against master. > > I've also shared this branch on aerogear/aerogear-unified-push-server > repo, so we could all work on it: > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js > > > Dan, I believe this branch should fix issues you were seeing. > > ~ Lukas > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Bom Dia! >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; >> wrote: >> >>> Good morning peeps, >>> >>> First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for >>> dedicating >>> their time helping with Keycloak integration. >>> >> >> Great to hear! :-) >> >> >>> >>> I think we are almost done, this is the current branch: >>> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js. >>> And now most >>> of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current logged >>> in user. >>> >>> Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need >>> to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages >>> now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak. >> >> >> Is the reason here that the 'sending endpoint' is also accessed from the >> AdminUI, for the 'compose a push' feature? >> >> If it's really required I am OK with that. However, I'd prefer to avoid >> it, as changing the behaviour of one of our two HTTP_BASIC endpoints >> ('device registration' and 'sending') also requires changes/updates on the >> relevant client SDKs. >> >> Greetings, >> Matthias >> >> >> >> >>> If you try to >>> send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic >>> authentication form atm. >>> >>> If you have a better idea, I'm all ears. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> abstractj >>> _______________________________________________ >>> aerogear-dev mailing list >>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > >

_______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

We definitely need a way how get bearer token from auth server without a form popping out if we are going to remove HTTP Basic. UPS is supposed to be used also by other applications using REST endpoints apart from Admin UI. E.g. you want to show all iOS installations on variant FooBar in your own dashboard application. Sender is the same case, your application might want to send a message via UPS. It might be using either JavaSender or direct REST calls. Ability to authorize your app non-interactively is crucial here. Karel On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:06:48 -0300 Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; wrote: > Good morning peeps, > > First I would like to thank Bill Burke, Stian, Sebastien and Lukas for > dedicating their time helping with Keycloak integration. > > I think we are almost done, this is the current branch: > https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/keycloak.js. > And now most of issues were gone and is also possible to display the current > logged in user. > > Now I'm working on fix the sender endpoint, to be more precise we need > to remove the HTTP basic authentication for sending push messages > now that most of the endpoints are protect by Keycloak. If you try to > send a push message based on my branch you will see the basic > authentication form atm. > > If you have a better idea, I'm all ears. > > -- > > abstractj > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev