would it be better to put it here or keep both
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-427
On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Jay Balunas wrote:
>
>> We should combine this with a general review of our developer coding standards
here -
https://github.com/aerogear/ide-config
>
> I still think that ide-config is collateral to a document describing what we use.
> I've opened
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-435 to track this
>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
>>
>>> I was talking with kris today about JS formatting, and he showed me this
[1].
>>>
>>> Even if I hate some of the proposed styles, having consistency wins over
personal preferences, and we don't have decent JS autoformatters, AFAIK.
>>>
>>> Any objections to following this as our guideline for JS code?
>>>
>>> [
1]:https://github.com/rwldrn/idiomatic.js/
>>>
>>> -- qmx
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev