+1 But they should still be some kind of "alert" send out (a push message ;) ) so we don't forget about it

Envoyé de mon iPhone Le Jun 29, 2013 à 9:43, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; a écrit : Hi, when someone creates a JIRA against AG-WHAT-NOT, these tickets have a default assignee. IMO this is bad. That feels like: Someone did assign it to himself in order to work on it. Which is not really true :) Also, for growing a community: If a ticket (for e.g. low-hanging fruits) is NOT assigned someone new will be more-likely go ahead and work on it, when it is NOT assigned to someone. So... I'd really vote for changing the "default assignee" to "not assigned" Thoughts ? -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Sébastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: +1 But they should still be some kind of "alert" send out (a push message ;) ) so we don't forget about it we have a JIRA "mailing list", for those kind of notifications http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-issues/ Envoyé de mon iPhone Le Jun 29, 2013 à 9:43, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; a écrit : > Hi, > > when someone creates a JIRA against AG-WHAT-NOT, these tickets have a default assignee. > > IMO this is bad. > > That feels like: Someone did assign it to himself in order to work on it. Which is not really true :) > > Also, for growing a community: If a ticket (for e.g. low-hanging fruits) is NOT assigned someone new will be more-likely go ahead and work on it, when it is NOT assigned to someone. > > > So... I'd really vote for changing the "default assignee" to "not assigned" > > > Thoughts ? > > > -Matthias > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

+1 and I thought I set that when I created the projects. If no one objects I'll update these to by "not assigned".