+1 Make totally sense

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > Howdy! > > Going over the code I recalled that right now we somewhat nail the > device-type for SimplePush clients down to just 'web' (see [1] and [2]). > > However w/ the new Java-Client, [3], (e.g. for desktop environments) it > would be pretty stupid to 'require' the 'web' there as well. > > Instead of coming up w/ something else, I'd propose handle it like we do > Android/iOS. > Basically: Feel free to register your device with a device-type what ever > you are up to; Use the same for the sending/querying part, if it fits your > backend/model. > > Any thoughts? > > Greetings, > Matthias > > > [1] > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear.org/blob/master/docs/specs/aerogear-... > [2] > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/src/m... > [3] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-simplepush-java-client > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev