Hey, status looks like: * Integration tests - passed * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF

* SP tests - passed * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems.

Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should be fixed.

I have filled following bugs: * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562 * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563 Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config. Karel _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Cc: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:14:05 PM > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > status looks like: > > > > * Integration tests - passed > > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF > > > > known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for it > > > > * SP tests - passed > > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems. > > > > possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and 0.10.x Interesting, this would cause issues with modifying existing data/adding new data. As Karel noted on AGPUSH-563, it looks like we would need a migration strategy for DB schema changes.

Farah > > > > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should be fixed. > > > > It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially the UPS > is now on staging/hold since one entire week > > > > > > I have filled following bugs: > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562 > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563 > > > > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set > > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config. > > > > Karel > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >

> From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > To: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 2:55:01 PM > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Farah Juma <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > > > To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > Cc: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:14:05 PM > > > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > status looks like: > > > > > > > > * Integration tests - passed > > > > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF > > > > > > > > > > known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for it > > > > > > > > > > * SP tests - passed > > > > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems. > > > > > > > > > > possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and 0.10.x > > > > Interesting, this would cause issues with modifying existing data/adding > > new data. As Karel noted on AGPUSH-563, it looks like we would need a > > migration strategy for DB schema changes. > > > > yep - I was thought that's part of the upgrade work; but we can file a > ticket to explicitly cover this That would be good. The database part of the upgrade is currently handled by the MySQL cartridge's "post_restore" action hook - this just restores the database to whatever it was before and doesn't handle schema changes: https://github.com/openshift/origin-server/blob/master/cartridges/openshi...

Once the necessary MySQL commands for migrating data from 0.9.x to 0.10.x are defined, we could try adding them to the AeroGear cartridge's "post_restore" action hook.

> > > > > > > > > > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should be > > fixed. > > > > > > > > > > It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially the > > UPS > > > is now on staging/hold since one entire week > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have filled following bugs: > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562 > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563 > > > > > > > > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set > > > > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config. > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >

From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; To: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 4:38:06 AM Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt;wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Farah Juma <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> >> > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> > To: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; >> > Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 2:55:01 PM >> > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Farah Juma <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> > > > To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > >> > > > Cc: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; >> > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:14:05 PM >> > > > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test >> results >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hey, >> > > > > >> > > > > status looks like: >> > > > > >> > > > > * Integration tests - passed >> > > > > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for it >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > * SP tests - passed >> > > > > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and >> 0.10.x >> > > >> > > Interesting, this would cause issues with modifying existing >> data/adding >> > > new data. As Karel noted on AGPUSH-563, it looks like we would need a >> > > migration strategy for DB schema changes. >> > > >> > >> > yep - I was thought that's part of the upgrade work; but we can file a >> > ticket to explicitly cover this >> >> That would be good. The database part of the upgrade is currently handled >> by the MySQL cartridge's "post_restore" action hook - this just restores >> the database to whatever it was before and doesn't handle schema changes: >> >> >> https://github.com/openshift/origin-server/blob/master/cartridges/openshi... > > > > ok > > >> >> >> Once the necessary MySQL commands for migrating data from 0.9.x to 0.10.x >> are defined, we could try adding them to the AeroGear cartridge's >> "post_restore" action hook. >> > Farah, I was just thinking: should we 'deplay' the upgrade hooks, until we do have the proper upgrade (including database schema) working?

-Matthias > > With "necessary MySQL commands" you mean those that take care of the > schema changes? I think generally having a migration script for the schema > is a nice thing to have, regardless of OpenShift. Once we are closer to our > 1.0.0 that's something we have to have. > > Are you planing on adding these necessary MySQL commands (assuming they > are relevant for taking care of schema changes ;-)) for our cartridge? Or > should we just track that requirement in a JIRA for now ? > > -Matthias > > > >> >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should be >> > > fixed. >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially >> the >> > > UPS >> > > > is now on staging/hold since one entire week >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I have filled following bugs: >> > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562 >> > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563 >> > > > > >> > > > > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set >> > > > > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config. >> > > > > >> > > > > Karel >> > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Matthias Wessendorf >> > > > >> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

From: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; To: matzew(a)apache.org Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 9:57:07 AM Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > To: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; > Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 1:47:06 AM > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Farah Juma <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > > > To: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > Cc: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 2:55:01 PM > > > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test results > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Farah Juma <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "Matthias Wessendorf" <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > > > > > To: "AeroGear Developer Mailing List" > > > > > <aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > > > > > Cc: "Farah Juma" <fjuma(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:14:05 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [aerogear-dev] UPS OpenShift cartridge 0.10.1 test > > results > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > > > > status looks like: > > > > > > > > > > > > * Integration tests - passed > > > > > > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * SP tests - passed > > > > > > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and > > 0.10.x > > > > > > > > Interesting, this would cause issues with modifying existing > > data/adding > > > > new data. As Karel noted on AGPUSH-563, it looks like we would need a > > > > migration strategy for DB schema changes. > > > > > > > > > > yep - I was thought that's part of the upgrade work; but we can file a > > > ticket to explicitly cover this > > > > That would be good. The database part of the upgrade is currently handled > > by the MySQL cartridge's "post_restore" action hook - this just restores > > the database to whatever it was before and doesn't handle schema changes: > > > > > > https://github.com/openshift/origin-server/blob/master/cartridges/openshi... > > > > ok > > > > > > > > Once the necessary MySQL commands for migrating data from 0.9.x to 0.10.x > > are defined, we could try adding them to the AeroGear cartridge's > > "post_restore" action hook. > > > > With "necessary MySQL commands" you mean those that take care of the schema > changes? Yes, exactly. > I think generally having a migration script for the schema is a > nice thing to have, regardless of OpenShift. Once we are closer to our > 1.0.0 that's something we have to have. +1 > Are you planing on adding these necessary MySQL commands (assuming they are > relevant for taking care of schema changes ;-)) for our cartridge? Or > should we just track that requirement in a JIRA for now ? Let's track this requirement in a JIRA for now. I think it'll be easier for you guys to define the necessary commands as schema changes are being made.

> > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should > > > > > > be > > > > fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially > > the > > > > UPS > > > > > is now on staging/hold since one entire week > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have filled following bugs: > > > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562 > > > > > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563 > > > > > > > > > > > > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set > > > > > > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config. > > > > > > > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:14:05 +0100 Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > status looks like: > > > > * Integration tests - passed > > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF > > > > known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for it > > > > * SP tests - passed > > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems. > > > > possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and 0.10.x > > > > > > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should be fixed. > > > > It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially the UPS > is now on staging/hold since one entire week It's up to you. I believe that 0.10.1 has many improvements and if really needed 0.10.2 with fixed UI can follow. > > > > > > I have filled following bugs: > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562 > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563 > > > > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set > > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config. > > > > Karel > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > Yes, let's move on with 0.10.1 and if really needed, we can indeed do > later 0.10.2 with UI fixes. > Release the kraken ! > +1 > > > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:14:05 +0100 >> Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hey, >> > > >> > > status looks like: >> > > >> > > * Integration tests - passed >> > > * UI tests - failed - UI glitches in FF >> > > >> > >> > known problem; not sure - but there might be already a ticket for it >> > >> > >> > > * SP tests - passed >> > > * Migration tests - failed - scheme problems. >> > > >> > >> > possible - we might have changed the data model between 0.9.x and >> 0.10.x >> > >> > >> > > >> > > Migration is not a part of cartridge but I guess that UI should be >> fixed. >> > > >> > >> > It's minor, not sure we should really stop the process; especially the >> UPS >> > is now on staging/hold since one entire week >> >> It's up to you. I believe that 0.10.1 has many improvements and if really >> needed 0.10.2 with fixed UI can follow. >> >> > >> > >> > > >> > > I have filled following bugs: >> > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-562 >> > > * https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-563 >> > > >> > > Note, as for Firefox DNS cache, just set >> > > network.dnsCacheExpirationGracePeriod=0 in about:config. >> > > >> > > Karel >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev