5:50 a.m.
hi,
our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).
thoughts?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
6:08 a.m.
Hi my friend on aerogear-controller and aerogear-security before the release of M6 on
aerogear, we did something like this:
0.0.1.M6, 0.0.2.M6
But now I'm planning (must to be discussed with qmx and Daniel) to follow the roadmap
strictly and release our snapshots with the release ID (M1) from controller and not
aerogear (M7). I'd like to have something like: 0.0.1.M1….and 1 release per week.
The reason for 0.0.1 is because ag-security is not mature enough to be 1.0.0, in my
opinion.
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hi,
our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).
thoughts?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
6:43 a.m.
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)
Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in
a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
thoughts?
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hi,
our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).
thoughts?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
6:45 a.m.
for the security part we probably need to stick to the same versioning strategy adopted to
the rest of the subprojects 1.0.0.{Alpha,M1..Mn,CR,Final}
you can have as many Milestone releases as you wish - they aren't considered stable
too :)
I kinda miss the 0.0.x versioning, but makes more sense to align with the rest :P
On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
Hi my friend on aerogear-controller and aerogear-security before the
release of M6 on aerogear, we did something like this:
0.0.1.M6, 0.0.2.M6
But now I'm planning (must to be discussed with qmx and Daniel) to follow the roadmap
strictly and release our snapshots with the release ID (M1) from controller and not
aerogear (M7). I'd like to have something like: 0.0.1.M1….and 1 release per week.
The reason for 0.0.1 is because ag-security is not mature enough to be 1.0.0, in my
opinion.
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hi,
>
> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>
>
> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>
> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
> you would call it).
>
> thoughts?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
7:10 a.m.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
:)
well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)
Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do it in
a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version
-M
thoughts?
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hi,
>
> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>
>
> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>
> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
> you would call it).
>
> thoughts?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
7:19 a.m.
+1 Let's do it.
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me
(mailto:qmx@qmx.me)> wrote:
> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)
well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)
>
> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say do
it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version
-M
>
> thoughts?
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
> >
> >
> > But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> > often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
> >
> > NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> > (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what
ever
> > you would call it).
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
> > -M
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
>
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org)
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
7:32 a.m.
<3
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
+1 Let's do it.
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Monday, October 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible :)
well... I appreciate them :-) especially when they build are using
timestamp endings ;)
Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, I'd say
do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
I don't mind to do regular "dev release", so I am also in fav. of a
timestamp-ish version
-M
thoughts?
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hi,
our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
(later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what ever
you would call it).
thoughts?
-M
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
3:54 p.m.
----- "Douglas Campos" <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
:)
Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods,
I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
thoughts?
There is a discussion of timestamping milestone releases here:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> hi,
>
> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>
>
> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>
> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what
ever
> you would call it).
>
> thoughts?
>
> -M
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
7:34 a.m.
On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Rodney Russ wrote:
----- "Douglas Campos" <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
> :)
>
> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods,
> I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
>
> thoughts?
There is a discussion of timestamping milestone releases here:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
+1 on 1.0.0.M1-857337463 timestamp versions for rapid dev releases.
>
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>>
>>
>> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
>> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>>
>> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
>> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what
> ever
>> you would call it).
>>
>> thoughts?
>>
>> -M
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
> -- qmx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
7:49 a.m.
kk
thanks for the feedback, guys!
-M
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Jay Balunas <jbalunas(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 2012, at 4:54 PM, Rodney Russ wrote:
>
> ----- "Douglas Campos" <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote:
>
>> Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible
>> :)
>>
>> Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods,
>> I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029
>>
>> thoughts?
>
> There is a discussion of timestamping milestone releases here:
>
> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
+1 on 1.0.0.M1-857337463 timestamp versions for rapid dev releases.
>
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1
>>>
>>>
>>> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release
>>> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ?
>>>
>>> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release
>>> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what
>> ever
>>> you would call it).
>>>
>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>> -- qmx
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
4392
days inactive
4393
days old
9 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Bruno Oliveira -
Douglas Campos -
Jay Balunas -
Matthias Wessendorf -
Rodney Russ