Re: [aerogear-dev] release versioning

----- "Douglas Campos" <qmx(a)qmx.me&gt; wrote: > Before we start to discuss versioning, maven snapshots are horrible > :) > > Honestly, if you **really** need to do releases between the periods, > I'd say do it in a timestamped fashion, like 1.0.0.M1.20121029 > > thoughts? There is a discussion of timestamping milestone releases here: https://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning

> > On Oct 29, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> hi, >> >> our current iOS release/tag is called => 1.0.0.M1 >> >> >> But... what if I want to roll another 'follow-up' release (release >> often, release early)... would it be named: 1.0.0.M1-1 ... -2 etc ? >> >> NOTE: I don't want to release the M2 now.... I just want to release >> (later this week) a newer version, "post M1 dev release" (or what > ever >> you would call it). >> >> thoughts? >> >> -M >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > -- qmx > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev