1:40 p.m.
The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta, but
passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
will have to support them sooner or later.
What do you guys think?
1:45 p.m.
+1
And maybe touch base with Gorkem who our Tooling specialist ;)
Seb
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com>wrote:
The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta,
but
passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
will have to support them sooner or later.
What do you guys think?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
3:37 p.m.
+1
On May 24, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta,
but
passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
will have to support them sooner or later.
What do you guys think?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
4:48 p.m.
++1
On 24 May 2013 22:37, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
+1
On May 24, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta, but
> passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
> release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
> will have to support them sooner or later.
>
> What do you guys think?
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
6:54 p.m.
what would adding support mean? Gradle, docs?
--
Gorkem
--
Gorkem
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com>wrote:
The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta,
but
passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
will have to support them sooner or later.
What do you guys think?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
12:17 p.m.
On Fri 24 May 2013 07:54:03 PM EDT, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
what would adding support mean? Gradle, docs?
My idea is at the low end supporting means we document how to import
and load the project and TODO application into Android Studio. We may
have to make structural changes to the project to get this to work.
On the high end of work we port the build system to the Gradle build
system used in Android Studio. This will eventually be done, but we
probably shouldn't make it a priority until after AS and Android's
Gradle build system have become finalized.
--
Gorkem
--
Gorkem
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
<mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta, but
passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
will have to support them sooner or later.
What do you guys think?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
8:30 a.m.
On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:17:46 -0400
Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri 24 May 2013 07:54:03 PM EDT, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
> what would adding support mean? Gradle, docs?
My idea is at the low end supporting means we document how to import
and load the project and TODO application into Android Studio. We may
have to make structural changes to the project to get this to work.
Are we able to keep the structure compatible for both IDEs (JBDS and AS)?
On the high end of work we port the build system to the Gradle build
system used in Android Studio. This will eventually be done, but we
probably shouldn't make it a priority until after AS and Android's
Gradle build system have become finalized.
Summers, this means Gradle for Android only, right? No plans to replace Maven
for backend stuff, correct?
> --
> Gorkem
>
> --
> Gorkem
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta, but
> passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
> release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
> will have to support them sooner or later.
>
> What do you guys think?
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
9:13 a.m.
On Wed, 29 May 2013 10:40:33 -0300
Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org> wrote:
Gradle for Android only, I don't have any plans to move backend
bits to
Gradle.
What a relief! Have you heard a big stone falling down off my shoulders?
Karel Piwko wrote:
> Summers, this means Gradle for Android only, right? No plans to replace
> Maven for backend stuff, correct?
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
9:15 a.m.
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2013 13:17:46 -0400
Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri 24 May 2013 07:54:03 PM EDT, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
> > what would adding support mean? Gradle, docs?
>
> My idea is at the low end supporting means we document how to import
> and load the project and TODO application into Android Studio. We may
> have to make structural changes to the project to get this to work.
>
Are we able to keep the structure compatible for both IDEs (JBDS and AS)?
The idea is to always work in both. Android Studio/Inteliij and
Eclipse/JBDS.
> On the high end of work we port the build system to the Gradle
build
> system used in Android Studio. This will eventually be done, but we
> probably shouldn't make it a priority until after AS and Android's
> Gradle build system have become finalized.
Summers, this means Gradle for Android only, right? No plans to replace
Maven
for backend stuff, correct?
Only to Android, but we haven't decided about it.
>
> > --
> > Gorkem
> >
> > --
> > Gorkem
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta,
but
> > passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
> > release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but
we
> > will have to support them sooner or later.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
9:16 a.m.
There is a lot of buzz around Android Studio but I think it still needs
time mature so I suggest the structural changes should not make the life of
an ADT based developer harder, at least for now.
I suspect that Gradle support will be required for Android development
regardless of the IDE used.
--
Gorkem
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, Summers Pittman wrote:
On Fri 24 May 2013 07:54:03 PM EDT, Gorkem Ercan wrote:
> what would adding support mean? Gradle, docs?
>
My idea is at the low end supporting means we document how to import and
load the project and TODO application into Android Studio. We may have to
make structural changes to the project to get this to work.
On the high end of work we port the build system to the Gradle build
system used in Android Studio. This will eventually be done, but we
probably shouldn't make it a priority until after AS and Android's Gradle
build system have become finalized.
--
> Gorkem
>
> --
> Gorkem
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma(a)redhat.com
> <mailto:supittma@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> The new Android build tools (IE Android Studio) are still in beta, but
> passos and I were thinking of adding support for them for the 1.2
> release. I havn't given these tools more than a cursory look, but we
> will have to support them sooner or later.
>
> What do you guys think?
> ______________________________**_________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/**mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev<https://lists....
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/**mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev<https://lists....
>
--
--
Gorkem
2:45 p.m.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:17:46PM -0400, Summers Pittman wrote:
On the high end of work we port the build system to the Gradle build
system used in Android Studio. This will eventually be done, but we
probably shouldn't make it a priority until after AS and Android's
Gradle build system have become finalized.
GAAAAAH
Thought gradle had a maven compatibility mode that we could make use of
:P
--
qmx
9:20 a.m.
For Android maven is irrelevant since google's stuff is based on ant
directly and moving to gradle nowadays. For the backend, JBoss tools are
maven based at least for examples etc maven should be the choice. OTOH I am
not sure if there is a real need to move to Gradle for server side at all,
I do not think we are building android and the backend together
--
Gorkem
On Thursday, June 6, 2013, Douglas Campos wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:17:46PM -0400, Summers Pittman wrote:
> On the high end of work we port the build system to the Gradle build
> system used in Android Studio. This will eventually be done, but we
> probably shouldn't make it a priority until after AS and Android's
> Gradle build system have become finalized.
GAAAAAH
Thought gradle had a maven compatibility mode that we could make use of
:P
--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <javascript:;>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
--
Gorkem
4220
days inactive
4234
days old
12 comments
8 participants
participants (8)
-
Bruno Oliveira -
Corinne Krych -
Daniel Passos -
Douglas Campos -
Gorkem Ercan -
Karel Piwko -
Sebastien Blanc -
Summers Pittman