If master is WF only, that should work.

If you guys keep EAP there, you'd need to target 1.6 and also not to use 1.8 for the runtime, see https://access.redhat.com/articles/111663 for EAP supported configurations. Karel On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 08:44 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > While at it :), as a follow-up thought on that, I am wondering if, on > MASTER, we should look into making it Java8? > > -Matthias > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > as said in the other email thread earlier this week ([1]) there is a bug > > in the last JBoss AS 7.1 release (see [2]), that basically means the server > > works properly only on EAP6.x and WildFly. > > > > Because of that, I am wondering about removing the -as7 module (see [3]), > > on our MASTER branch. For the 1.0.x branch, I'd like to keep it, for EAP > > usage reasons. > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > -Matthias > > > > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-October/009435.html > > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4694 > > [3] > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/serve... > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > If master is WF only, that should work. > yes, see original email :-) > > If you guys keep EAP there, you'd need to target 1.6 and also not to use > 1.8 for the runtime, see https://access.redhat.com/articles/111663 for > EAP supported configurations. > > Karel > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 08:44 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > While at it :), as a follow-up thought on that, I am wondering if, on > > MASTER, we should look into making it Java8? > > > > -Matthias > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > > wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > as said in the other email thread earlier this week ([1]) there is a > bug > > > in the last JBoss AS 7.1 release (see [2]), that basically means the > server > > > works properly only on EAP6.x and WildFly. > > > > > > Because of that, I am wondering about removing the -as7 module (see > [3]), > > > on our MASTER branch. For the 1.0.x branch, I'd like to keep it, for > EAP > > > usage reasons. > > > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > [1] > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-October/009435.html > > > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4694 > > > [3] > > > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/serve... > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

long term, on master, exclusively jsk8

On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > Just a clarification, you mean making it *also* Java8 compatible, not > exclusively Java8, right? > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 10:35 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; > wrote: > > > > > If master is WF only, that should work. > > > > > > > yes, see original email :-) > > > > > > > > > > If you guys keep EAP there, you'd need to target 1.6 and also not to > use > > > 1.8 for the runtime, see https://access.redhat.com/articles/111663 > for > > > EAP supported configurations. > > > > > > Karel > > > > > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 08:44 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > While at it :), as a follow-up thought on that, I am wondering if, > on > > > > MASTER, we should look into making it Java8? > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < > matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > as said in the other email thread earlier this week ([1]) there > is a > > > bug > > > > > in the last JBoss AS 7.1 release (see [2]), that basically means > the > > > server > > > > > works properly only on EAP6.x and WildFly. > > > > > > > > > > Because of that, I am wondering about removing the -as7 module > (see > > > [3]), > > > > > on our MASTER branch. For the 1.0.x branch, I'd like to keep it, > for > > > EAP > > > > > usage reasons. > > > > > > > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-October/009435.html > > > > > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4694 > > > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/serve... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aerogear-dev mailing list > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile

On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 12:58 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org > > wrote: > > > long term, on master, exclusively jsk8 > > > but :-) initial steps would be to make it also Java8 compatible. Once that > is there, we will see how to move on. > I think in the past qmx has expressed interested in looking at JDK8, as he > already looked into the doclet issue a bit Agree with initial steps. As for exclusively jdk8 - it would make more sense to keep jdk7 if still supported by WF to me. So, if WF drops JDK7, it's probably the right time to drop it as well in UPS but I don't see any reason why to artificially limit users in runtime options.

> > -M > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: > > > >> Just a clarification, you mean making it *also* Java8 compatible, not > >> exclusively Java8, right? > >> > >> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 10:35 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com&gt; > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > If master is WF only, that should work. > >> > > > >> > > >> > yes, see original email :-) > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > If you guys keep EAP there, you'd need to target 1.6 and also not to > >> use > >> > > 1.8 for the runtime, see https://access.redhat.com/articles/111663 > >> for > >> > > EAP supported configurations. > >> > > > >> > > Karel > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 08:44 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >> > > > While at it :), as a follow-up thought on that, I am wondering if, > >> on > >> > > > MASTER, we should look into making it Java8? > >> > > > > >> > > > -Matthias > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf < > >> matzew(a)apache.org&gt; > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > as said in the other email thread earlier this week ([1]) there > >> is a > >> > > bug > >> > > > > in the last JBoss AS 7.1 release (see [2]), that basically means > >> the > >> > > server > >> > > > > works properly only on EAP6.x and WildFly. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Because of that, I am wondering about removing the -as7 module > >> (see > >> > > [3]), > >> > > > > on our MASTER branch. For the 1.0.x branch, I'd like to keep it, > >> for > >> > > EAP > >> > > > > usage reasons. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > What do you guys think? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -Matthias > >> > > > > > >> > > > > [1] > >> > > > >> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2014-October/009435.html > >> > > > > [2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AS7-4694 > >> > > > > [3] > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/tree/master/serve... > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > >> > > > > > >> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > >> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > >> > > > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > aerogear-dev mailing list > >> > > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > aerogear-dev mailing list > >> > > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > aerogear-dev mailing list > >> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> aerogear-dev mailing list > >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sent from Gmail Mobile > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:38:31PM +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > long term, on master, exclusively jsk8 -1 There are no clear advantages for us on this, which effectively would mean just putting a virtual restriction for our users.

making it work on jdk8 on the other hand is a high-value task, in my roadmap :)

-- qmx _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev