[hibernate-dev] Re: JBoss Cache and Hibernate Integration

So I started breaking out 3.3 as a separate code base on the Hibernate svn trunk. The first thing done was this org.hibernate.cache.Cache splitting. So at this point we now have the ability to be completely free in how we cache entity-data versus collection-data versus query-data versus timestamps-data within the same "second level cache". But now looking back at #1, I am no longer certain of the conclusions; and to me the wiki did not make it clear to me what the "long term" solution was supposed to be (nor really what the "short term" solution is/was either). Anyone remember the specific conclusions with regards to this point? Re: #4 : what exactly are these differences? Now is the time to merge it back... Re: #5 : what about the other solution I proposed where instead of registering synchs directly with the TC/TM, you instead delegate it to a strategy which can route the request back through Hibernate; Hibernate can then manage ordering the callbacks? Re: #6 : I'm actually in favor of just moving to the new (2.0) API; easier from a management perspective. > Ok, so my notes from the call, based on issues from the wiki > > > 1. Multiple caches will probably only formally make it in the next > major Hibernate release - 3.3. > > 2 Notes on putForExternalRead() functionality, in addition to the > solution presented on the wiki: > - PFER only goes through if node does not exist; no-op otherwise > - Force asynchronous mode for replication or invalidation to prevent > any blocking > - 0ms lock timeout to prevent any blocking here either. If this > fails, PFER is a no-op > - no to separate thread necessary, since we will be operating with a > 0ms timeout, async replication and a no-op if the node exists. The > only real chance of any blocking here is JGroups FC which is > considered small enough a case. > > 3. Since JBC 1.4.1.SP1, write locks are not acquired on parents when > adding or removing children, to be more accurate to repeatable read > semantics. WLs can still be acquired on parents if enabled in the > configuration (see "LockParentForChildInsertRemove" in > http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbosscache/freezone/doc..., > which defaults to false). As such, this contention should no longer > be a problem. > > 4. Brian implemented for EJB3 clustering in AS 4.2, will make it's > way back into HIbernate in the 3.3 timeframe? > > 5. Do nothing for now since the urgency is removed. Only fails on > old versions of JBoss TS. In future (JBC 2.1 timeframe) look at what > the microcontainer has to offer with synchronisation registrations. > > 6. Coordination issue > > 7. Galder to come back with more details here, but general consensus > is not to perform transparent retries. > Feel free to add stuff I may have missed or further thoughts. > Very useful and productive call! > > Cheers, > Manik