API differences in Hibernate ORM 5.1 vs 5.3
by Gail Badner
Hi,
There were lots of differences in the compatibility report, so as a first
step, I've excluded packages/classes that I considered SPI, internal, or
"grey area". This reduced the the differences to a more manageable amount.
You can see a summary of the incompatibilities along with suggested
mitigation at [1].
The report is attached to [1], along with a zip with instructions for
running the report.
I believe there are some "false positives" in the report, and I have
documented them in the section, "False Positives?".
Feel free to comment on the article.
Thanks,
Gail
[1]
https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/HibernateORMBinaryCompatibilityBetween51...
5 days, 18 hours
IP banned from forum
by Gunnar Morling
Hi,
Is anyone banning users from the forum? I am getting "A ban has been
issued on your IP address."
I don't think banning by IP is a good strategy as many users will have
dynamic IPs from their hoster's shared pool, so it's a random game to
hit an IP previously banned due to some other user's spam.
Thanks,
--Gunnar
6 days
New CI machine preview
by Sanne Grinovero
You're all welcome to play with http://54.225.162.168/
however please keep these in mind:
- it's not the final machine: don't put too much effort in creating
nice build scripts as we'll reset it to clean state soon. We *might*
be able to store jobs defined so far, but we might choose not to.
- domain name should be coming: ci.hibernate.org ..not sure when, got
no replies so far from.
- authentication: just click on login, it will use OAuth2 to request
your identity via your GitHub account. Permissions to create new jobs,
edit existing jobs, run a build manually depend on your github account
be part of the Hibernate organization (or not, in which case you have
read only status)
At this stage I'd like to get a feeling if the hardware is powerful
enough, and also we need to select which other plugins we want to use,
I'm looking especially to:
- static analysis reports
- pull requests integration
both are relatively undefined, we can of course start simple and
improve later.. just checking this fits basic needs now.
Sanne
2 months, 3 weeks
JDK 15 is in Rampdown Phase One
by Rory O'Donnell
Hi Sanne,
*Per the JDK 15 schedule , we are in Rampdown Phase One* *[1] *
*Please advise if you find any issues while testing the latest Early
Access builds.
*
* Schedule for JDK 15
o *2020/06/11 Rampdown Phase One*
o 2020/07/16 Rampdown Phase Two
o 2020/08/06 Initial Release Candidate
o 2020/08/20 Final Release Candidate
o 2020/09/15 General Availability
* Features included in JDK 15:
o JEP 339: Edwards-Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (EdDSA)
<http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/339>
o JEP 360: Sealed Classes (Preview) <http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/360>
o JEP 371: Hidden Classes <http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/371>
o JEP 372: Remove the Nashorn JavaScript Engine
<http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/372>
o JEP 373: Reimplement the Legacy DatagramSocket API
<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/373>
o JEP 374: Disable and Deprecate Biased Locking
<http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/374>
o JEP 375: Pattern Matching for instanceof (Second Preview)
<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/375>
o JEP 377: ZGC: A Scalable Low-Latency Garbage Collector
<http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/377>
o JEP 378: Text Blocks <http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/378>
o JEP 379: Shenandoah: A Low-Pause-Time Garbage Collector
<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/379>
o JEP 381: Remove the Solaris and SPARC Ports
<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/381>
o JEP 383: Foreign-Memory Access API (Second Incubator)
<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/383>
o JEP 384: Records (Second Preview)
<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/384>
o JEP 385: Deprecate RMI Activation for Removal
<https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/385>
*JDK 15 **Early Access build 28 **is available**at : - jdk.java.net/15/*
These early-access, open-source builds are provided under the GNU
General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception**Release
notes
* Release notes
o http://jdk.java.net/15/release-notes
* Recent fixes that might be of interest
o Build 27
+ JDK-8233215: jpackage doesn't allow enough flexibility for
file type binding
+ JDK-8244582: Remove terminally deprecated Solaris-specific
SO_FLOW_SLA socket option
+ JDK-8245068: Implement Deprecation of RMI Activation
+ JDK-8246770: Atomic::add() with 64 bit value fails to link
on 32-bit platforms
# Reported by JaCoCo
o Build 26
+ JDK-8240871: SSLEngine handshake status immediately after
the handshake can be NOT_HANDSHAKING rather than FINISHED
with TLSv1.3
# Reported by Apache Tomcat
o Build 25
+ JDK-8206925: Support the certificate_authorities extension
+ JDK-8239480: Support for CLDR version 37
+ JDK-8243925: Toolkit#getScreenInsets() returns wrong value
on HiDPI screens (Windows)
*JDK 16 Early Access build 2 ****is available**at : - jdk.java.net/16/*
These early-access, open-source builds are provided under the GNU
General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception.*
*
*_Survey on _**_jinfo, jmap, jstack serviceability tools in JDK:_ *
* Oracle is considering deprecation and (eventual) removal of 3 JDK
tools - jinfo, jmap, jstack.
* The Survey Link
<https://www.questionpro.com/a/TakeSurvey?tt=n%2BDcx/aY3aA%3D> will
remain open through July 15 2020.
Rgds, Rory
[1] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk-dev/2020-June/004401.html
--
Rgds, Rory O'Donnell
Quality Engineering Manager
Oracle EMEA, Dublin, Ireland
5 years, 6 months
v6 and load-event
by Steve Ebersole
Historically we made a terrible design mistake with the event system as a
whole. This has both a confusing design impact and a very real performance
impact. The main problem is the smashing together of things that handle
events and things that listen to such events.
In working on a problem in v6 I have come to a point where fixing this
design flaw for load events specifically would be a huge help. So I'm
going to make a proposal for how to specifically change this for load event
handling. The plan at the moment is to not make similar changes to the
other event types for now, though I certainly would like to keep them all
in mind with regard to the overall design for if/when we can get to the
others.
So I'd love feedback specifically regarding (1) general design considering
other event types and (2) issues/concerns specific to load event type.
I created a simple example at
https://gist.github.com/sebersole/2a1c3ac010a166fc91e62b088179678d
Thanks!
5 years, 7 months
Re: [hibernate-dev] My email
by Sanne Grinovero
Sure that's not a problem.
However, 6.x has many open issues still - it might be best to track
things on JIRA as usual:
- https://hibernate.atlassian.net/secure/Dashboard.jspa
Either way is fine in principle, just normally we use the list to
discuss proposals; for example if you plan to contribute a fix and
have questions, or just want to let others know that you're looking at
it then the list is more suitable.
Thanks!
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 11:26, Catalin Tudose <catalin.tudose(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Great, thank you!
> There is a possible issue I discovered with 6.0.0.Alpha5.
> Would that be fine to share it on this list?
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 1:22 PM Sanne Grinovero <sanne(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Catalin,
>>
>> looks like you managed to post to the list!
>>
>> welcome,
>> Sanne
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 11:15, Catalin Tudose <catalin.tudose(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > I would like to post to the hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org mailing list!
>> > My e-mail is catalin.tudose(a)gmail.com
>> >
>> > Thank you!
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>> > hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> >
5 years, 7 months
My email
by Catalin Tudose
Hello!
I would like to post to the hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org mailing list!
My e-mail is catalin.tudose(a)gmail.com
Thank you!
5 years, 7 months
