oops reading Gunnar's answer, I'm probably answer the wrong question :)
On 5 oct. 2010, at 17:23, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
public doStuff(@Param("name") String name,
@Param("command") Object command) {
...
}
On 5 oct. 2010, at 16:07, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
> Where exactly do you want to add the parameter? To the Validator.validateXYZ()
methods?
>
>
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:54:10 +0200, Gunnar Morling
<gunnar.morling(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> a use case might be a data-centric application, where you for performance
>> reasons don't want to validate graphs completely once a failure occured, but
>> don't want to face the user with single validation errors one after the
>> other either.
>>
>> Specifying the validation order would surely be useful. But I wouldn't tie
>> these things together. I suggest to introduce a numeric parameter and for a
>> start either make clear that the validation order is not specified or only
>> support values 0 (don't stop on first error) and 1 (= failFast). Later on,
>> if validation order is spec'd, other values than these could easily be
>> supported. If we now introduce a boolean parameter, the API would be
>> somewhat "polluted" if we come up with a numeric parameter later on.
Then we
>> either had two parameters (leaving space for inconsistent configurations) or
>> had to remove the boolean parameter again.
>>
>> Gunnar
>>
>>
>> 2010/10/4 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>>
>>> Ive been toying with the number idea while talking with Max.
>>> Im not sure what use case that solves provided the highly unpredictable
>>> nature of what's get returned.
>>>
>>> It might be more useful and get a usecase if we spec what gets returned
>>> roughly. Like deep-last algorithm etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4 oct. 2010, at 22:17, Gunnar Morling
<gunnar.morling(a)googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I like the idea. Emmanuel's performance test showed an execution time
per
>>> validation of 11 vs. 74 ms on my system, so there seems to be some
>>> potential. Instead of having a "failFast" flag one could also
introduce a
>>> numeric parameter to control, when validation should stop. A value of
"1"
>>> would be equal to the flag being true, but one could also decide to stop
>>> just after 3 validation errors for instance.
>>>
>>> Gunnar
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/10/4 Emmanuel Bernard < <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>>> emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>>>
>>>> That or slowish validations.
>>>>
>>>> One typical use case is that:
>>>>
>>>> if ( validator.validate(customer,
StraightToValidationScreen.class).size()
>>>>> 0 ) {
>>>> //manual process
>>>> }
>>>> else {
>>>> //automatic process
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I've committed a non scientific perf test that shows an average
of 5x
>>>> perf improvement on an object graph of 5 object (one master and 4
children)
>>>> and 4 constraints on A and 3 on B. Around 22ms vs 120 ms. (log4j logs set
to
>>>> ERROR). The perf change is visible even on smallish graphs.
>>>>
>>>> It can be worthwhile.
>>>>
>>>> On 4 oct. 2010, at 16:20, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What would be the usecase? Saving time in large object graphs where I
am
>>>> only interested in whether there is a
>>>>> failure at all? You really need LARGE object graphs to make this
worth
>>>> while.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:45:34 +0200, Emmanuel Bernard
<<emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>
>>>> emmanuel(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
<
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/commits/failFast>
>>>>
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/commits/failFast
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The idea is to stop a the first failure.
>>>>>> You can enable that :
>>>>>> - by property
>>>>>> - at config time
>>>>>> - when the Validator is created
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at
>>>>>>
>>>>
<
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/blob/failFast/hiber...
>>>>
http://github.com/emmanuelbernard/hibernate-validator/blob/failFast/hiber...
>>>>>> for code examples.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>>>> <hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org>hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> <
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev