On Jul 17, 2012, at 3:38 AM, Steve Ebersole <steve(a)hibernate.org> wrote:
Going to throw another perhaps crazy suggestion out there...
Thinking we should consider:
1) branching 4.1
2) integrating my JPA 2.1 work onto master
3) merge master (with JPA 2.1) to metamodel branch
I think this route is okay. when JPA 2.1 SPEC will be released?
Couple of thought processes go into this. First, I do not see us doing anymore 4.x
releases outside of possibly doing a 4.2 *specifically* to release JPA 2.1 support.
Ideally I want JPA 2.1 support to be released as 5.0 hand-in-hand with the metamodel work.
The only reason we would not go that route is if the metamodel work drags on and
threatens us releasing JPA 2.1 support in a timely manner. I do not see that happening,
just stating a known condition. Besides the JPA 2.1 support is actually up-to-date with
the latest available specs (and actually a little bit ahead of the latest available spec
draft after this week). So again, all-in-all I still do not foresee the need for a 4.2 at
this time.
agree, don't foresee any needs to do a 4.2 release
On 07/15/2012 08:27 AM, Strong Liu wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I think we should do this again since there are some changes in master that I want to
use in metamodel, and maybe we should do this regularly to minimize the conflicts?
>
> Steve is the best to do this, since he already did this once, but in case he is
busying on other stuff, I'm voluntarily to do this .
>
> WDYT?
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------
> Best Regards,
>
> Strong Liu <stliu at hibernate.org>
>
http://about.me/stliu/bio
>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
--
steve(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
-------------------------
Best Regards,
Strong Liu <stliu at hibernate.org>
http://about.me/stliu/bio