On 08/14/2009 03:26 PM, Brian Stansberry wrote:
On 08/13/2009 06:27 AM, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Of my original email, there's a section that I don't think has been
> answered yet
>
> On 08/04/2009 10:37 AM, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
>> Finally, a question to the list, specially for Brian/Steve who worked on
>> the JBC2/3 integration layer:
>>
>> - Do we need a similar timestamp region local cache implementation for
>> an ISPN based cache provider?
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> This question focuses on the TimestampsRegionImpl (and potentially
> ClusteredConcurrentTimestampsRegionImpl) work done for JBC 2.x/3.x
> integration layer. Is there a need for a similar region implementation
> for Infinispan? I'm not sure I fully understand the need for
> TimestampsRegionImpl to manage this local cache.
>
Timestamps caching has different semantics than the other types, hence
the different region impl. I don't know any reason why that wouldn't be
the case with Infinispan.
It's not a "local cache"? It's replicated.
Yeah, it's replicated, got confused with query cache.
> Talking about timestamps, I assume that no evictions should ever happen
> for the timestamps cache and this is something that could be validated
> on startup, that eviction strategy is NONE.
>
+1.
> Cheers,
--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache