Re: [infinispan-dev] manual eviction and indexing

Hi Adrian, +1 good catch. but what's a realistic use case for {indexing + eviction + no cachestore} ? I guess some use cases might exist but I don't think it's critical, would you agree? and what about automatic eviction? I think the guiding principle should be that if an entry can be retrieved by key it should be searchable, and vice-versa, if I can find it by running a query I should be able to load the result. So expiry and other forms of eviction should also be considered, but if there is no practical use case we can consider making this an illegal configuration or simply log a warning about the particular configuration. Sanne ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Sanne, > > I found that manual eviction does not update the index. I think manual > eviction should behave like a remove, if there are no cache stores > configured. > > Here's a test and a 'fix' :) > https://github.com/anistor/infinispan/tree/t_manual_evict_and_indexing > > Let's discuss this when you have time. > > There is also the more complex situation of in-DataContainer eviction ... >