Re: [infinispan-dev] Fwd: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release

Or perhaps look at enhancing FCS. :) JDBM's lack of concurrent transactional writes is a pretty big show stopper for most. http://code.google.com/p/jdbm2/ On 3 Jan 2011, at 10:43, Galder Zamarreño wrote: > It'd be interesting to hear what the rest have to say, but I haven't seen JDBM much in use in the forums. > > Clearly JDBM based cache stores compete with FileCacheStore, so if you're interested in integrating JDBM2, you might wanna investigate what it brings different/better as opposed to FCS. > > That might be key to transforming current FCS usages (i.e AS6 EJB3 SFSB passivation) to JDBM2. > > On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Elias Ross wrote: > >> Now that I left my old company, I might be able to work on integrating this. >> >> But is there still any interest in JDBM? Does it actually get used? >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Jan Kotek <opencoeli(a)gmail.com&gt; >> Date: Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:18 PM >> Subject: [Jdbm-developer] JDBM2 stable release >> To: jdbm-developer(a)lists.sourceforge.net, jdbm-general(a)lists.sourceforge.net >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is fork of 1.0, >> which integrates most of patches developed in here. >> It is faster and more space efficient than older release. >> >> home page: >> http://code.google.com/p/jdbm2/ >> announcement: >> http://www.kotek.net/blog/jdbm2_released >> >> Regards, >> Jan Kotek >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > > -- > Galder Zamarreño > Sr. Software Engineer > Infinispan, JBoss Cache > > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Manik Surtani manik(a)jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org