All issues should be going upstream first anyway into what is currently
marked as AS8 if that is what you mean?
On 17/04/13 11:16, Thomas Diesler wrote:
Hi Darran,
this does not work. There is no living soul in QA that could verify my patch and
guarantee that it works for the reporter. For good reason, we distinguish between
Resolved/Closed - only the reporter of an issue can make the transition from Resolved to
Closed.
I'd say this process is broken.
I suggest we do all work in jboss-as until an issue is not only Resolved but also Closed.
Closed issues can be picked up by QA and the associated commits cherry-picked and whatever
other voodoo they do in their non-public systems.
As it stands now the reporter has to wait until the next EAP release before he can know
whether his issue is truly fixed. That is obviously broken, isn't it?
cheers
--thomas
On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Darran Lofthouse <darran.lofthouse(a)jboss.com> wrote:
> Thomas - to get it into EAP it must have also had a BZ which means it
> would be verified by QE.
>
> Regards,
> Darran Lofthouse.
>
>
> On 17/04/13 09:12, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> when I resolve a bug for EAP, how can the reporter verify that the patch is
working so that the issue can be closed?
>>
>> cheers
>> --thomas
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Thomas Diesler
>> JBoss OSGi Lead
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
>> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
JBoss OSGi Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx