[JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBCACHE-97) ReadWriteLockWithUpgrade: UpgradeException with more than 1 reader/writer waiting to upgrade lock
by Jason T. Greene (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-97?page=all ]
Jason T. Greene updated JBCACHE-97:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0.GA
(was: 2.0.0.CR1)
> ReadWriteLockWithUpgrade: UpgradeException with more than 1 reader/writer waiting to upgrade lock
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBCACHE-97
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-97
> Project: JBoss Cache
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Clustering
> Reporter: Bela Ban
> Assigned To: Jason T. Greene
> Fix For: 2.0.0.GA
>
>
> TxDeadlockUnitTestCase has 2 methods that show the following stack traces:
> testMoreThanOneUpgrader:
> Upgrader#0: get(/a/b/c)
> Upgrader#1: get(/a/b/c)
> main: locks:
> /a (read owners=[<null>:2, <null>:1])
> /b (read owners=[<null>:2, <null>:1])
> /c (read owners=[<null>:2, <null>:1])
> Upgrader#0: put(/a/b/c)
> Upgrader#1: put(/a/b/c)
> Upgrader#1: org.jboss.cache.lock.LockingException: acquireWriteLock(): lock upgrade failed for /a/b/c (caller=<null>:2); - nested throwable: (org.jboss.cache.lock.UpgradeException: upgradeLockAttempt(): more than one reader trying to simultaneously upgrade to write lock)
> Upgrader#0: org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException: upgrade lock for /a/b/c could not be acquired after 3000 ms. Lock map ownership Read lock owners: [<null>:2]
> Write lock owner: null
> (caller=<null>:1)
> org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException: upgrade lock for /a/b/c could not be acquired after 3000 ms. Lock map ownership Read lock owners: [<null>:2]
> Write lock owner: null
> (caller=<null>:1)
> at org.jboss.cache.lock.IdentityLock.acquireWriteLock(IdentityLock.java:155)
> at org.jboss.cache.Node.acquireWriteLock(Node.java:448)
> at org.jboss.cache.Node.acquire(Node.java:417)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.LockInterceptor.lock(LockInterceptor.java:199)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.LockInterceptor.invoke(LockInterceptor.java:144)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.Interceptor.invoke(Interceptor.java:40)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.CreateIfNotExistsInterceptor.invoke(CreateIfNotExistsInterceptor.java:145)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.Interceptor.invoke(Interceptor.java:40)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.UnlockInterceptor.invoke(UnlockInterceptor.java:35)
> at org.jboss.cache.TreeCache.invokeMethod(TreeCache.java:2998)
> at org.jboss.cache.TreeCache.put(TreeCache.java:1657)
> at org.jboss.test.cache.test.local.TxDeadlockUnitTestCase$MyUpgrader._run(TxDeadlockUnitTestCase.java:346)
> at org.jboss.test.cache.test.local.TxDeadlockUnitTestCase$GenericThread.run(TxDeadlockUnitTestCase.java:213)
> at org.jboss.test.cache.test.local.TxDeadlockUnitTestCase$GenericThread.run(TxDeadlockUnitTestCase.java:213)
> and
> testConcurrentUpgrade():
> MyThread#1: get(/a/b/c)
> MyThread#2: get(/a/b/c)
> MyThread#2: done, locks:
> /a (read owners=[<null>:2])
> /b (read owners=[<null>:2])
> /c (read owners=[<null>:2])
> MyThread#1: done, locks:
> /a (read owners=[<null>:2, <null>:1])
> /b (read owners=[<null>:2, <null>:1])
> /c (read owners=[<null>:2, <null>:1])
> MyThread#2: put(/a/b/c)
> MyThread#1: put(/a/b/c)
> MyThread#1: org.jboss.cache.lock.LockingException: acquireWriteLock(): lock upgrade failed for /a/b/c (caller=<null>:1); - nested throwable: (org.jboss.cache.lock.UpgradeException: upgradeLockAttempt(): more than one reader trying to simultaneously upgrade to write lock)
> MyThread#2: org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException: upgrade lock for /a/b/c could not be acquired after 3000 ms. Lock map ownership Read lock owners: [<null>:1]
> Write lock owner: null
> (caller=<null>:2)
> org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException: upgrade lock for /a/b/c could not be acquired after 3000 ms. Lock map ownership Read lock owners: [<null>:1]
> Write lock owner: null
> (caller=<null>:2)
> at org.jboss.cache.lock.IdentityLock.acquireWriteLock(IdentityLock.java:155)
> at org.jboss.cache.Node.acquireWriteLock(Node.java:448)
> at org.jboss.cache.Node.acquire(Node.java:417)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.LockInterceptor.lock(LockInterceptor.java:199)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.LockInterceptor.invoke(LockInterceptor.java:144)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.Interceptor.invoke(Interceptor.java:40)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.CreateIfNotExistsInterceptor.invoke(CreateIfNotExistsInterceptor.java:145)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.Interceptor.invoke(Interceptor.java:40)
> at org.jboss.cache.interceptors.UnlockInterceptor.invoke(UnlockInterceptor.java:35)
> at org.jboss.cache.TreeCache.invokeMethod(TreeCache.java:2998)
> at org.jboss.cache.TreeCache.put(TreeCache.java:1657)
> at org.jboss.test.cache.test.local.TxDeadlockUnitTestCase$MyThread._run(TxDeadlockUnitTestCase.java:317)
> at org.jboss.test.cache.test.local.TxDeadlockUnitTestCase$GenericThread.run(TxDeadlockUnitTestCase.java:213)
> at org.jboss.test.cache.test.local.TxDeadlockUnitTestCase$GenericThread.run(TxDeadlockUnitTestCase.java:213)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBPORTAL-1351) Portlets "forget" that they are in EDIT mode
by Adam Warski (JIRA)
Portlets "forget" that they are in EDIT mode
--------------------------------------------
Key: JBPORTAL-1351
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1351
Project: JBoss Portal
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Portal Core
Affects Versions: 2.6.CR1
Reporter: Adam Warski
Assigned To: Julien Viet
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 2.6.CR2
Attachments: edit-test.war.tar.gz
Portlets forget that they are in "edit" mode and go back to "view" on an action request.
The attached portlet demonstrates it.
Steps to reproduce:
1. open the page, in the portlet click the render url (<portlet:renderURL portletMode="edit" />)
2. the edit-mode jsp appears, with an action url (<portlet:actionURL />)
3. click the action URL, the portlet goes back to "view" mode.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (BPEL-144) publish document/literal endpoints
by Alejandro Guizar (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/BPEL-144?page=all ]
Alejandro Guizar resolved BPEL-144.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Done
SoapHandler no longer assumes the endpoint is RPC-oriented. Instead, it retrieves the port description through the ws stack integration subsystem and formats/parses SOAP messages according to the binding information.
Updating the service generation tool to cover document-oriented endpoints will be tracked as a separate issue.
> publish document/literal endpoints
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: BPEL-144
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/BPEL-144
> Project: JBoss jBPM BPEL
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Engine
> Affects Versions: jBPM BPEL 1.0 alpha 4
> Environment: jaxrpc, saaj, w3c dom
> Reporter: Alejandro Guizar
> Assigned To: Alejandro Guizar
> Fix For: jBPM BPEL 1.1 GA
>
>
> jBPM BPEL currently generates service WSDL documents and processes SOAP request/response messages only for RPC/literal web services. Enhancing the service generation tool and the JAX-RPC handler to cover the document style is crucial for interoperability, particulary with .NET.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months