[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-1031) AdjListJDBCCacheLoaderConfig should not depend on JDBCCacheLoaderOld
by Galder Zamarreno (JIRA)
AdjListJDBCCacheLoaderConfig should not depend on JDBCCacheLoaderOld
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBCACHE-1031
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-1031
Project: JBoss Cache
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 2.0.0.BETA2
Reporter: Galder Zamarreno
Assigned To: Galder Zamarreno
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.0.0.CR1
AdjListJDBCCacheLoaderConfig, which is the base of the current JDBCCacheLoader
configuration should not depend on the old cache loader implementation
public AdjListJDBCCacheLoaderConfig()
{
setClassName(JDBCCacheLoaderOld.class.getName());
}
/**
* For use by {@link JDBCCacheLoaderOld}.
*
* @param base generic config object created by XML parsing.
*/
AdjListJDBCCacheLoaderConfig(IndividualCacheLoaderConfig base)
{
setClassName(JDBCCacheLoaderOld.class.getName());
populateFromBaseConfig(base);
}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-964) Optional 1.x marshalling for CacheLoaders using VersionAwareMarshaller
by Galder Zamarreno (JIRA)
Optional 1.x marshalling for CacheLoaders using VersionAwareMarshaller
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBCACHE-964
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-964
Project: JBoss Cache
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: Cache loaders
Reporter: Galder Zamarreno
Assigned To: Galder Zamarreno
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.0.0.BETA2, 2.0.0.GA
Customers that want to use JBossCache 2.x might be reluctant to
migrate their data from one format to the other. I can see how an
existing customer might think this is a proper pain in the ass,
independent of the benefits, and might reduce adoption among them.
We want to remove barriers upgrading, but at the same time, we want
new customer to use new marshalling, so I'd actually implement the
possibility to use 1.x marshalling which is plan java serialization at
the CacheLoader level. This could easily achieved adding a property to
the <properties> section.
The default in 2.x should be to use VAM and only people who are
resilient to change their existing stores to VAM should use the 1.x
option, which would need explicitly definition.
This option also makes it easier for migration purpouses as customers
should be able to start two cache instances with different cache loader
marshalling method set. They could then loop through the first one using
get operations and call put in the second instance.
Just note that this does not apply to the marshalling done at
replication level as there's no hard data that needs migrating.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBFORUMS-198) when I delete an user I have NullPointerException
by Luca Stancapiano (JIRA)
when I delete an user I have NullPointerException
-------------------------------------------------
Key: JBFORUMS-198
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBFORUMS-198
Project: JBoss Forums
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Forum Model Layer
Affects Versions: 1.2.0 Alpha
Environment: any
Reporter: Luca Stancapiano
Assigned To: Ryszard Kozmik
Fix For: 1.2.0 Alpha
hi julien.......I tried to delete an user that is in posts of jboss forum.....after I deleted this user, if I click on posts where that user had posted I have NullPointerException
I thought to correct this bug , using a UserNA object that implements User interface. This UserNA is used when I select the user from database and I haven't returned rows because user is deleted. In this case I add UserNA to User object of Post object. UserNA is declared in ForumPortlet object as final static , so the same object can to be used for each deleted user. What do you mean about it? I send you the patch
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
19 years, 3 months