May 2007 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] Reopened: (JBRULES-272) "in" keyword in column constraints

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-272?page=all ] Mark Proctor reopened JBRULES-272: ---------------------------------- > "in" keyword in column constraints > ---------------------------------- > > Key: JBRULES-272 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-272 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Feature Request > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Affects Versions: 3.0-rc3 > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Michael Neale > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR2 > > > So we can support things like > Person(status in [1,2,3]) > where it creates a set from the right hand operand and checks for existence of the left. > May be tricky with literals versus bound vars, but should be possible. Parser will need to be able to pass an array I think. > This means the Descrs will need to be modified - or is it only literals supported? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Reopened: (JBRULES-37) non DSL based NLP for simple predicates

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-37?page=all ] Mark Proctor reopened JBRULES-37: --------------------------------- > non DSL based NLP for simple predicates > --------------------------------------- > > Key: JBRULES-37 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-37 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Feature Request > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Rule Assemply/SPI > Affects Versions: 3.0-beta1 > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Michael Neale > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR3 > > Original Estimate: 3 days > Remaining Estimate: 3 days > > Should be based on a config file, which spels out what possesive strings are, conjunctions etc, what are redundant > So we can do: > The Dog's name is fido and its age is less than 2 > Dog(name=="fido", age < 2) > ['s] is possesive, [is] is the operator, [its] references the Fact, The is stripped out etc. > basic format of > {fact, field, opr, arg} conjuntion {repeat} > [08:54] <bob> if default lang could do cheesy reflection name-based stuff, perhaps? > [08:54] <bob> turning verbs into methods by reflection? > [08:54] <bob> w/o any specific mappings? > [08:54] <bob> <-- cluefree > [08:55] <bob> import com.myco.pets.* > [08:56] <bob> ... > [08:56] <bob> dog name is "Ted" > [08:56] <bob> Dog( name='Ted' ) > [08:56] <bob> etc > [08:56] <bob> purely very basic by default > [08:56] <bob> or am I thinking about it wrong? > [08:56] <bob> mic! > [08:56] <bob> stop perving > [08:56] <bob> start IRCing! > [08:58] <mic> bob: yeah can do that to > [08:58] <mic> started working on something like that, but on the back burner for the moment > [08:58] <mic> of course, need to know that it is a Dog object to do reflection etc... > [08:58] <mic> but thats more of a 3.1 thing > [08:59] <mic> would be a seperate expander > [09:00] <bob> yah, string[0] is a noun, search imports for class named string[0] > [09:00] <bob> 'k > [09:00] <bob> noun attribute operator value > [09:00] <bob> filter out throw-away words like "a" "the" etc -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBRULES-265) Automatic DSL populator (wizard/utility)

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-265?page=all ] Mark Proctor closed JBRULES-265. -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.MR2 (was: 4.0.0.MR3) Resolution: Won't Fix > Automatic DSL populator (wizard/utility) > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: JBRULES-265 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-265 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Feature Request > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Eclipse IDE > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Michael Neale > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR2 > > > This would introspect selected objects, and create LHS and RHS DSL mappings to access each and every field. > For LHS, something like > There is Person {p} > Person {p} age is less then {age} > Person {p} age is greater then {age} > .. and so on (depending on field data type). > ..possibly generate a mapping that includes all fields in one line > For RHS, something like > Set age of Person {p} to {age} > etc etc... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Reopened: (JBRULES-265) Automatic DSL populator (wizard/utility)

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-265?page=all ] Mark Proctor reopened JBRULES-265: ---------------------------------- > Automatic DSL populator (wizard/utility) > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: JBRULES-265 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-265 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Feature Request > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Components: Eclipse IDE > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Michael Neale > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR3 > > > This would introspect selected objects, and create LHS and RHS DSL mappings to access each and every field. > For LHS, something like > There is Person {p} > Person {p} age is less then {age} > Person {p} age is greater then {age} > .. and so on (depending on field data type). > ..possibly generate a mapping that includes all fields in one line > For RHS, something like > Set age of Person {p} to {age} > etc etc... -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-534) Rename Column to Pattern

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

Rename Column to Pattern ------------------------ Key: JBRULES-534 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-534 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Feature Request Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Components: All Reporter: Mark Proctor Assigned To: Mark Proctor Fix For: 3.1-m1 We are now going to refer to Column as Patterns, as it was confusing users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

3
6
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBRULES-813) Two opposing rules get fired

by erel sagi (JIRA)

Two opposing rules get fired ---------------------------- Key: JBRULES-813 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-813 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public (Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 3.1-m1 Reporter: erel sagi Assigned To: Mark Proctor When using the following two rules with an empty working memory both rules get fired: =================================== rule rule1 when not Person(gender == Consts.Unknown) then System.out.println("rule1"); end rule rule2 when exists Person(gender == Consts.Unknown) then System.out.println("rule2"); end =================================== -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

2
3
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Reopened: (JBRULES-275) FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275?page=all ] Mark Proctor reopened JBRULES-275: ---------------------------------- > FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JBRULES-275 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Task > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Affects Versions: 3.0-rc3 > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Mark Proctor > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR2 > > Original Estimate: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 1 day > > At the moment the FunctionFixer tries to find what it thinks are function calls: > foo(bar); becomes Foo.foo(bar); > It does an OK job. > What would simplify it, was if it worked off a list of known functions for the rules being compiled. > Then it could do an enhanced "find and replace" with each function name (as long as it doesn't appear in a string). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBRULES-275) FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275?page=all ] Mark Proctor closed JBRULES-275. -------------------------------- Resolution: Out of Date > FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JBRULES-275 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Task > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Affects Versions: 3.0-rc3 > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Mark Proctor > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR2 > > Original Estimate: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 1 day > > At the moment the FunctionFixer tries to find what it thinks are function calls: > foo(bar); becomes Foo.foo(bar); > It does an OK job. > What would simplify it, was if it worked off a list of known functions for the rules being compiled. > Then it could do an enhanced "find and replace" with each function name (as long as it doesn't appear in a string). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBRULES-275) FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275?page=all ] Mark Proctor closed JBRULES-275. -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.MR2 (was: 4.0.0.MR3) Resolution: Done > FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JBRULES-275 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Task > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Affects Versions: 3.0-rc3 > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Mark Proctor > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR2 > > Original Estimate: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 1 day > > At the moment the FunctionFixer tries to find what it thinks are function calls: > foo(bar); becomes Foo.foo(bar); > It does an OK job. > What would simplify it, was if it worked off a list of known functions for the rules being compiled. > Then it could do an enhanced "find and replace" with each function name (as long as it doesn't appear in a string). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Reopened: (JBRULES-275) FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex

by Mark Proctor (JIRA)

[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275?page=all ] Mark Proctor reopened JBRULES-275: ---------------------------------- > FunnctionFixer - improve it to use simpler regex > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: JBRULES-275 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-275 > Project: JBoss Rules > Issue Type: Task > Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) > Affects Versions: 3.0-rc3 > Reporter: Michael Neale > Assigned To: Mark Proctor > Fix For: 4.0.0.MR2 > > Original Estimate: 1 day > Remaining Estimate: 1 day > > At the moment the FunctionFixer tries to find what it thinks are function calls: > foo(bar); becomes Foo.foo(bar); > It does an OK job. > What would simplify it, was if it worked off a list of known functions for the rules being compiled. > Then it could do an enhanced "find and replace" with each function name (as long as it doesn't appear in a string). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

19 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira May 2007