[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-266) KIE resolving dependend artifacts issue
by RH Bugzilla Integration (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
RH Bugzilla Integration commented on DROOLS-266:
------------------------------------------------
Mario Fusco <mfusco(a)redhat.com> made a comment on [bug 1014157|https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014157]
> KIE resolving dependend artifacts issue
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-266
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-266
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.CR3
> Reporter: Kurt Stam
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Fix For: 6.0.0.CR5
>
> Attachments: kie-load-from-maven-issue.tgz, kie-load-from-maven-issue.tgz
>
>
> This happens when for a dependency the scope is
> - set to 'provided' and
> - a parameter (in the case ${jbpm.version}) is used in the version field.
> So the relevant entry in the pom is:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.drools</groupId>
> <artifactId>drools-core</artifactId>
> <version>${drools.version}</version>
> <scope>provided</scope>
> </dependency>
> which leads to
> 11:15:02,584 WARN Dependency artifact not found for: org.jbpm:jbpm-bpmn2:${jbpm.version}
> and then the NPE. I'm guessing the parameter is not being resolved.
> 1. it probably should resolve parameters
> 2. if a dependency is scoped as 'provided' I think it is supposed to locate it on the classpath and NOT from maven. However I'm not sure this is the way that works in testing anyway.
> 3. if the dependency cannot be found it should probably stop and not even proceed rather then warn?
> 4. it should be interesting to see why it gets the NPE.
> If you change the dependency from 'provided' to 'test' things work fine.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-2201) Server-side XTS handlers not added if @WebService#portName is missing
by Gytis Trikleris (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Gytis Trikleris commented on WFLY-2201:
---------------------------------------
I do not want to raise the PR until JBTM-1963 is sorted, because it may cause the applications to fail unexpectedly...
> Server-side XTS handlers not added if @WebService#portName is missing
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFLY-2201
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-2201
> Project: WildFly
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: XTS
> Reporter: Paul Robinson
> Assignee: Gytis Trikleris
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 8.0.0.CR1
>
>
> To reproduce, remove portName or targetNameSpace attributes from org.jboss.narayana.compensations.functional.distributed.DistributedTest in the TXFramework suite. You will see that the test fails with:
> {code}
> "MustUnderstand headers: [{http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06}CoordinationContext] are not understood"
> {code}
> The problem is that the Endpoint is not recognised, by the XTS subsytem, as having a valid @WebService annotation if these attributes are missing. In reality they are optional and an application should be allowed to leave them off. However, these attribute values are used by the XTS subsytem, so we would need to find a way of using the defaults if they are missing from the annotation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SASL-39) Support for stronger hashes as alternatives to MD5
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SASL-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ]
Darran Lofthouse updated SASL-39:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.0.4.CR2
(was: 1.0.4.CR1)
> Support for stronger hashes as alternatives to MD5
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SASL-39
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SASL-39
> Project: JBoss SASL Provider
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 1.0.4.CR2
>
>
> Presently Digest authentication is based on MD5 - however we should either update the mechanism or add new mechanisms to support the use of stronger hashes.
> As this library is used both client and server side installations that require the stronger hashes can just ensure the client and server have the latest version of this library - installations that still require interaction with MD5 will need to ensure that it is still available as a mechanism.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (SASL-39) Support for stronger hashes as alternatives to MD5
by Darran Lofthouse (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SASL-39?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy... ]
Darran Lofthouse updated SASL-39:
---------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 1
> Support for stronger hashes as alternatives to MD5
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SASL-39
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SASL-39
> Project: JBoss SASL Provider
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 1.0.4.CR2
>
>
> Presently Digest authentication is based on MD5 - however we should either update the mechanism or add new mechanisms to support the use of stronger hashes.
> As this library is used both client and server side installations that require the stronger hashes can just ensure the client and server have the latest version of this library - installations that still require interaction with MD5 will need to ensure that it is still available as a mechanism.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 9 months
[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-291) ClassCastException during constraint jitting when an interface is used for implementation and traiting
by Mario Fusco (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-291?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ]
Mario Fusco resolved DROOLS-291.
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.5.1.Final
6.0.0.CR5
Resolution: Done
> ClassCastException during constraint jitting when an interface is used for implementation and traiting
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DROOLS-291
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-291
> Project: Drools
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Affects Versions: 5.5.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR4
> Reporter: Davide Sottara
> Assignee: Mario Fusco
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.5.1.Final, 6.0.0.CR5
>
>
> The following combination is needed:
> - an interface IX with at least one getter/setter pair
> - a trait IY extending IX
> - a class K implementing IX
> - a jittable constraint on IX
> The constraint is first triggered by an "instance" of IY,
> but jitted by an instance of K.
> The condition analyzer assumes that IY is the natural
> domain of the constratint, rather than IX. The jitted
> constraint will then try to cast K to IY, resulting in
> a disruptive CCE
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
12 years, 9 months