[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3107) Allow slave hosts to ignore missing RBAC config resources
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3107:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha4
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha3)
> Allow slave hosts to ignore missing RBAC config resources
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3107
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3107
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> Part of parent issue whereby slaves can ignore missing RBAC constraint resources for write requests coming from the DC.
> If the DC sent the request, then the address is ok overall. So if it's missing on the slave that means the slave doesn't have that constraint registered and doesn't need to handle the op.
> This fix could possibly be backported to the 2.1.x and to EAP 6.4.x in lieu of adding transformers as part of the parent issue. In the case of 2.1.x it also allows slaves to ignore the related extension even if the code for it is present (which is only a minor benefit.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-2857) Usage of wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user in core configuration files
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-2857:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha4
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha3)
> Usage of wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user in core configuration files
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-2857
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-2857
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Domain Management, Test Suite
> Reporter: Ken Wills
> Assignee: Ken Wills
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> The property wildfly.sasl.local-user.default-user is present in some, commented out on other, and absent from some default configuation files in core. (the default host-slave.xml for example has it, but it appears to have no effect if removed). There is uneven usage of it throughout the testsuite config files.
> We should review and make the usage (or non-usage) consistent.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3073) Handle TERM gracefully
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3073:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha4
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha3)
> Handle TERM gracefully
> ----------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3073
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3073
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Domain Management
> Reporter: Ben Parees
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> The wildfly server currently -terminates immediately- performs a standard (non-graceful) shutdown in response to a TERM signal. To achieve a -clean- graceful shutdown requires invoking the CLI tooling. This is particularly problematic in container environments like kubernetes where the container process (wildfly in this case) is going to get a TERM signal when the container needs to be moved.
> While it's possible to wrapper the process and handle the TERM and then invoke the CLI, it would be preferable for the server process itself to cleanly handle a TERM signal by waiting for in-flight requests to complete (w/ some grace period of course).
> Having this as configurable behavior would be good if there are backwards compatibility concerns about introducing this behavior change.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3019) The bin/product.conf and the org.jboss.as.product:wildfly-core module should come in via an FP
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3019:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha4
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha3)
> The bin/product.conf and the org.jboss.as.product:wildfly-core module should come in via an FP
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3019
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3019
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Server
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> For WFLY-4692 we moved the "product" stuff out of core-feature-pack and into dist. But this means it doesn't end up in the skinny dist produced by the "build" module. Plus it makes the "dist" a kind of FP of its own.
> The stuff in dist/src/distribution should be its own FP. That one *perhaps* depends on core-feature-pack. Then build and dist use the new FP in addition to or instead of core-feature-pack.
> So, core-feature-pack is independently usable, in other dists, but our offiical build/dist, which has our official product module, picks up the new FP.
> Whether the new "product" FP depends on core-feature-pack depends on how we want to use it; i.e. can this bin/product.conf and module be used in some other flavor of dist.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3382) Further Enhance Elytron Permission Configuration
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3382:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha4
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha3)
> Further Enhance Elytron Permission Configuration
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3382
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3382
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Security
> Reporter: Darran Lofthouse
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> This has currently been simplified to a single resource for the out of the box configuration, however this brings issues as now permissions are duplicated so modifications need to be replicated instead of to a single location.
> Finding a way for the default required permissions to be defined in one location could help eliminate the duplication.
> We could also consider going one step further and subsystems register the default permissions that should be granted.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-3255) Complex type AttributeDefinition variants don't handle ParameterCorrector properly
by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ]
Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-3255:
-------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha4
(was: 4.0.0.Alpha3)
> Complex type AttributeDefinition variants don't handle ParameterCorrector properly
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WFCORE-3255
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-3255
> Project: WildFly Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Management
> Affects Versions: 3.0.1.Final
> Reporter: Brian Stansberry
> Assignee: Brian Stansberry
> Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha4
>
>
> If a field in a complex attribute (i.e. one that uses Object...AttributeDefinition) has a ParameterCorrector configured, that corrector never gets called. That's because only a corrector on the top level attribute gets called.
> These classes should automatically use an internal corrector that first calls any corrector configured for fields, and then, if one is present, calls any top level corrector.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)
8 years, 8 months