February 2017 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-13) End users can call non-published management API operations

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-13: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > End users can call non-published management API operations > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-13 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-13 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Ladislav Thon > Labels: EAP > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > > It's not possible to call "non-published" operations (those that are not visible in the resource tree, e.g. {{describe}}) via JMX, while it's entirely possible to call them via CLI (e.g. {{/subsystem=security:describe}}) and other management interfaces. > The problem lies in the fact that {{ModelControllerMBeanHelper.invoke}} method checks {{if (!accessControl.isExecutableOperation(operationName))}} and the {{isExecutableOperation}} method assumes that the operation will be visible in the resource tree. In fact, there is a comment stating _should not happen_, but now we know that it indeed _can_ happen. > What's more, it gives a misleading error message. The {{isExecutableOperation}} returns {{false}} for unknown operations, which results in {{Not authorized to invoke operation}} message. Which is wrong in two different ways simultaneously: 1. the problem isn't authorization, but the fact that the operation can't be found; 2. the user (e.g. in the {{SuperUser}} role) _is_ authorized. > I'm considering this low priority, because 1. JMX is likely to be very rarely used to access the management interface, 2. hiding information isn't nearly as important as leaking them, 3. non-published operations aren't nearly as important as the published ones. It's worth a JIRA nevertheless. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1351) FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1351: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > FilePermission for XNIO and Marshalling modules are required for Remoting to run with security manager > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1351 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1351 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Remoting, Security > Reporter: Ondrej Kotek > Assignee: David Lloyd > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > Attachments: 1-no-createEndpoint-permission.stacktrace, 2-no-createXnioWorker-permission.stacktrace, 3-no-addConnectionProvider-permission.stacktrace, 4-no-accessDeclaredMembers-permission.stractrace, 5-no-suppressAccessChecks-permission.stracktrace > > > # Running _NestedRemoteContextTestCase_ (from WildFly _testsuite/integration/basic_) with security manager, like > {noformat} > ./integration-tests.sh -Dts.basic -Dts.noSmoke -Dtest=NestedRemoteContextTestCase -Dsecurity.manager > {noformat} > results in exception: > {noformat} > java.io.IOException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XNIO001001: No XNIO provider found > {noformat} > To make it work, permissions like following need to be added to _permissions.xml_ of _ejb.ear_: > {noformat} > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/xnio/nio/main/*", "read"), > new FilePermission("/home/okotek/git/wildfly/dist/target/wildfly-10.0.0.CR5-SNAPSHOT/modules/system/layers/base/org/jboss/marshalling/river/main/*", "read"), > new RemotingPermission("createEndpoint"), > new RuntimePermission("createXnioWorker"), > new RemotingPermission("addConnectionProvider"), > new RuntimePermission("modifyThread"), > new RuntimePermission("accessDeclaredMembers"), > new ReflectPermission("suppressAccessChecks") > {noformat} > which is very confusing. > Why do I need add seemingly unrelated permissions, like _FilePermission_ for XNIO and marshalling or _RuntimePermission_ for createXnioWorker? Such behavior should be fixed or properly documented. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1282) Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1282: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > Unable to create HTTPS connection using *ECDH_RSA* cipher suites / kECDHr cipher string > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1282 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1282 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security > Affects Versions: 1.0.2.Final > Environment: Oracle Java > Reporter: Martin Choma > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > Attachments: client_debug_eap6.log, client_debug_eap7.log, server-cert-key-ec.jks, server_debug_eap6.log, server_debug_eap7.log > > > User using these cipher suites / cipher name in EAP6 won't be able to use it in EAP7. > Setting as critical as these cipher suites, are considered for strong and widely used in my opinion. > In server log, error "no cipher suites in common" can be seen using -Djavax.net.debug=all. > Note, that analogous configuration in EAP6 works fine. > Issue can be seen on Oracle Java only, as on OpenJDK / IBM these suites are not provided by method getDefaultCipherSuites(). > Also is it possible to log "no cipher suites in common" and similar tls handshake errors without -Djavax.net.debug for better troubleshooting? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1059) RestartParentResourceAdd/RemoveHandler should handle capability registration

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1059: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > RestartParentResourceAdd/RemoveHandler should handle capability registration > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1059 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1059 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 2.0.0.CR6 > Reporter: Paul Ferraro > Assignee: Tomaz Cerar > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > > RestartParentResourceAddHandler and RestartParentResourceRemoveHandler do not extend the respective AbstractAddStepHandler and AbstractRemoveStepHandler base classes, and thus does not handle capability [un]registration. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-887) "Deprecate" using an expression in model refs to interfaces

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-887: ------------------------------------ Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > "Deprecate" using an expression in model refs to interfaces > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-887 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-887 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > > SocketBindingGroupResourceDefinition and OutboundSocketBindingResourceDefinition both have attributes that represent model refs to interface resources, but which also allow expressions. > Model references should not allow expressions. These were "grandfathered in" when the large scale expression support roll out happened for AS 7.2 / EAP 6.1. > There's no metadata facility to record that expression support is deprecated, but the add handler for these should log a WARN if they encounter an expression. Hopefully in EAP 8 we can then remove expression support. > We should look for other cases like this too, although those changes should be separate JIRAs. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1145) Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1145: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > Review of HostController / Application Server Remoting connections > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1145 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1145 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Darran Lofthouse > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Labels: affects_elytron > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > > Where an application server connects back to it's host controller in domain mode it used the same Remoting connector exposed possibly for native domain management access. > The problem with this is that as soon as any security restrictions are placed on the connector exposed by the host controller then the application servers require something to work with this - this is even though we are only ever talking about loopback communication between two process on the same machine. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1802) Integrate OpenSSL Provider registration with Elytron

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1802: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > Integrate OpenSSL Provider registration with Elytron > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1802 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1802 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Task > Components: Security > Reporter: Stuart Douglas > Assignee: Darran Lofthouse > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > > We need to remove the following block from SecurityRealmResourceDefinition: - > {code} > static { > //register the Openssl Provider, if possible > //not really sure if this is the best place for it > try { > OpenSSLProvider.register(); > DomainManagementLogger.ROOT_LOGGER.registeredOpenSSLProvider(); > } catch (Throwable t){ > DomainManagementLogger.ROOT_LOGGER.debugf(t, "Failed to register OpenSSL provider"); > } > } > {code} > Registration will then be possible within the Elytron subsystem configuration. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1649) RBAC constraint config modifications will fail in a mixed domain if the modified constraint is not present in the legacy slave

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1649: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > RBAC constraint config modifications will fail in a mixed domain if the modified constraint is not present in the legacy slave > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFCORE-1649 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1649 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Reporter: Brian Stansberry > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > > The management model for RBAC constraints is maintained using synthetic resources, with resources only existing for those items (SensitivityClassification and ApplicationClassification) that are registered in the current process. Operations that touch classifications unknown to that process will fail due to missing resource problems. > This is a big problem in the following scenarios: > 1) Mixed domain, where legacy slaves do not know about newly introduced classifications. > 2) Slimming scenarios where slaves are ignoring unrelated parts of the domain wide config and also don't have some extension installed, resulting in classifications registered by those extensions not being present. > A partial workaround to 1) is for the kernel to register transformers for newly introduced classifications (e.g. SERVER_SSL added in EAP 6.4.7 and EAP 7). But: > -- that doesn't help with problem 2) > -- only the kernel can register kernel transformers, so if extensions add new classifications there is no way for them to register the transformer. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1606) Server reload is needed for modified security-realm even if {allow-resource-service-restart=true} is used

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1606: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > Server reload is needed for modified security-realm even if {allow-resource-service-restart=true} is used > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1606 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1606 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management, Security > Affects Versions: 2.0.10.Final > Reporter: Ondrej Lukas > Assignee: ehsavoie Hugonnet > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > > When security-realm, which is set as http-interface security-realm in management-interfaces, is modified and operation used {allow-resource-service-restart=true} header then server is NOT in reload-required state but modified security realm does not work correctly until server is manually reloaded. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFCORE-1560) Cli calls leak resources in Host Controller when repeatedly calling jboss-cli.sh

by Brian Stansberry (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Brian Stansberry updated WFCORE-1560: ------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 3.0.0.Beta4 (was: 3.0.0.Beta3) > Cli calls leak resources in Host Controller when repeatedly calling jboss-cli.sh > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFCORE-1560 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-1560 > Project: WildFly Core > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Domain Management > Affects Versions: 2.0.8.Final > Environment: OS: CentOS 7.2 > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.77-b03, mixed mode) > Wildfly-10.0.0-Final > Reporter: Michael Noack > Assignee: Brian Stansberry > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 3.0.0.Beta4 > > Attachments: JVM-DC.png, console-dc.log, host-controller.log, process-controller.log > > > When executing management commands using jboss-cli.sh against the domain controller of a cluster repeatedly the host controller uses up more and more memory in oldgen. After several thousands of runs of jboss-cli the host controller eventually becomes unresponsive (see attached picture for memory consumption, dc became entirely unresponsive at roughly 6:30am): > [root@dc broken]# /opt/wildfly-10.0.0.Final-DC/bin/./jboss-cli.sh --connect --user="username" --password="password" --command=":read-children-names(child-type=host)" > Failed to connect to the controller: The controller is not available at xx.xx.xx.xx:9993: java.net.ConnectException: WFLYPRT0023: Could not connect to https-remoting://xx.xx.xx.xx:9993. The connection timed out: WFLYPRT0023: Could not connect to https-remoting://xx.xx.xx.xx:9993. The connection timed out > I discovered the issue when testing whether https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-974 was actually resolved in wildfly-10.0.0.Final as advertised. I can confirm that the issue is different, since no OOM-Exceptions are thrown. However the DC still becomes useless, since it won't accept any connections anymore. -I will check whether the work-around from WFCORE-974 applies to this issue as well.- However the work-around from WFCORE-974 doesn't fix this issue. > Please note that the attached logs are UTC, while the monitoring is UTC+2. Also the collection values are misleading since I haven't adapted my monitoring to the new output of jstat in JDK8. PU and PC are thus MU and MC. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

9 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira February 2017