January 2019 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11388) User is not informed about incorrect values in exposed-subsystems for MP Metrics

by Lin Gao (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Lin Gao commented on WFLY-11388: -------------------------------- PR: https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/11998 is up to work on both cases: * Showing warnings on server boots if unknown subsystems are specified in exposed-subsystems attribute * When trying to specify unknown subsystems to exposed-subsystems attribute, it will fail > User is not informed about incorrect values in exposed-subsystems for MP Metrics > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-11388 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11388 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Bug > Components: MP Metrics > Reporter: Rostislav Svoboda > Assignee: Lin Gao > Priority: Critical > > User is not informed about incorrect values in exposed-subsystems for MP Metrics > When I do stuff like > {code} > /subsystem=microprofile-metrics-smallrye/:write-attribute(name=exposed-subsystems, value=["batch_jberet"]) > {code} > instead of > {code} > /subsystem=microprofile-metrics-smallrye/:write-attribute(name=exposed-subsystems, value=["batch-jberet"]) > {code} > I get no warning about non-existing subsystem. > User should be informed about misconfiguration. > Question is when: > - when server boots > - when the cli / management command is invoked > - both cases -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11352) WildFly registers multiple distinct drivers for current MySQL driver jar

by Lin Gao (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Lin Gao commented on WFLY-11352: -------------------------------- PR: https://github.com/wildfly/wildfly/pull/11997 was fired with consideration of above comment: * create the first driver just as if there were only one * create other drivers using current strategy. > WildFly registers multiple distinct drivers for current MySQL driver jar > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: WFLY-11352 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11352 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: JCA > Affects Versions: 14.0.1.Final > Reporter: Stephen Fikes > Assignee: Lin Gao > Priority: Minor > > When MySQL drivers are deployed as jars (rather than [modules|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3218]), multiple named drivers: > ... INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.jdbc] (MSC service thread 1-3) WFLYJCA0005: Deploying non-JDBC-compliant driver class com.mysql.jdbc.Driver (version 5.1) > ... INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.jdbc] (MSC service thread 1-3) WFLYJCA0005: Deploying non-JDBC-compliant driver class com.mysql.fabric.jdbc.FabricMySQLDriver (version 5.1) > ... INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.jdbc] (MSC service thread 1-1) WFLYJCA0018: Started Driver service with driver-name = mysql-connector-java-5.1.44-bin.jar_com.mysql.jdbc.Driver_5_1 > ... INFO [org.jboss.as.connector.deployers.jdbc] (MSC service thread 1-1) WFLYJCA0018: Started Driver service with driver-name = mysql-connector-java-5.1.44-bin.jar_com.mysql.fabric.jdbc.FabricMySQLDriver_5_1 > Consequently, references to the driver by name (such as the below) fail to resolve > {code} > <datasource jndi-name="java:jboss/datasources/mysql" pool-name="MySQL" enabled="true"> > ... > <driver>mysql-connector-java-5.1.44-bin.jar</driver> > ... > </datasource> > {code} > This issue was [already resolved|https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-3218] for the case where a module was used to deploy the driver. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-5497) Add <distributable/> to shared-session-config schema

by Paul Ferraro (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Paul Ferraro updated WFLY-5497: ------------------------------- Forum Reference: https://developer.jboss.org/message/941522#941522 > Add <distributable/> to shared-session-config schema > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-5497 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-5497 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Clustering, Web (Undertow) > Affects Versions: 10.0.0.CR2 > Reporter: Paul Ferraro > Assignee: Paul Ferraro > Priority: Major > > Currently, the shared-session-config does not indicate whether a distributable or non-distributable session manager should be used. Consequently, we assign the session manager implementation based on the availability of the module providing the distributed implementation. Since the default infinispan web session configuration attempts to passivate sessions on shutdown, users will see NotSerializableExceptions on shutdown if they use non-serializable session attributes - even if their web applications do not define themselves as being <distributable/>. > To clarify this ambiguity, we should add a <distributable/> element (a la web.xml) to the shared-session-config schema to determine which session manager implementation to use. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (WFLY-11388) User is not informed about incorrect values in exposed-subsystems for MP Metrics

by Lin Gao (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Lin Gao reassigned WFLY-11388: ------------------------------ Assignee: Lin Gao (was: Jeff Mesnil) > User is not informed about incorrect values in exposed-subsystems for MP Metrics > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFLY-11388 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-11388 > Project: WildFly > Issue Type: Bug > Components: MP Metrics > Reporter: Rostislav Svoboda > Assignee: Lin Gao > Priority: Critical > > User is not informed about incorrect values in exposed-subsystems for MP Metrics > When I do stuff like > {code} > /subsystem=microprofile-metrics-smallrye/:write-attribute(name=exposed-subsystems, value=["batch_jberet"]) > {code} > instead of > {code} > /subsystem=microprofile-metrics-smallrye/:write-attribute(name=exposed-subsystems, value=["batch-jberet"]) > {code} > I get no warning about non-existing subsystem. > User should be informed about misconfiguration. > Question is when: > - when server boots > - when the cli / management command is invoked > - both cases -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3482) Terminology for DMN import

by Liz Clayton (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3482: ------------------------------------- [~stetson.robinson] I have the idea that importing/including the file brings in more than just the model, that data types for example are included as well. If that's correct, then I wonder if saying "included models" would convey that well? Section 6.3.3 of the spec., offers some info. > Terminology for DMN import > -------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-3482 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3482 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Components: DMN Editor > Reporter: Liz Clayton > Assignee: Stetson Robinson > Priority: Minor > Labels: drools-tools > > Define best term to use for importing a DMN file, from the project directory. Importing a .dmn file will include file nodes, data types, etc. The term will be used for a tab label, button labels, and the like. > UX mockups currently use "import" but other terms such as "include" have been discussed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3486) Scenario Simulation: Export agenda info from session to a report

by Amy Glass (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Amy Glass commented on DROOLS-3486: ----------------------------------- For now, referencing some HTML mockups [~srambach] did a while ago: https://cdn.rawgit.com/srambach/BxMS-frontend/master/drools-test-results.... https://cdn.rawgit.com/srambach/BxMS-frontend/a0fbbfbd95919c9cb495126edf2... > Scenario Simulation: Export agenda info from session to a report > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-3486 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3486 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing, Test Scenarios Editor > Reporter: Toni Rikkola > Assignee: Toni Rikkola > Priority: Major > Labels: UX, UXTeam > > Report information should at least contain information about test coverage and what rules fired and what not. Proposed format is CSV file. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3486) Scenario Simulation: Export agenda info from session to a report

by Amy Glass (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Amy Glass edited comment on DROOLS-3486 at 1/11/19 5:09 PM: ------------------------------------------------------------ [~kkufova] Since this one is labeled with UX and UX Team should we reassign this to [~zhutaojiajia] for the time being and then reassign to the developer once the design is complete? It is estimated already so perhaps this is back end work for the developer to do, separate from UX. But in that case, should the UX labels be removed? Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Thank you. was (Author: aglass): [~kkufova] Since this one is labeled with UX and UX Team should we reassign this to [~taozhu] for the time being and then reassign to the developer once the design is complete? It is estimated already so perhaps this is back end work for the developer to do, separate from UX. But in that case, should the UX labels be removed? Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Thank you. > Scenario Simulation: Export agenda info from session to a report > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-3486 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3486 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing, Test Scenarios Editor > Reporter: Toni Rikkola > Assignee: Toni Rikkola > Priority: Major > Labels: UX, UXTeam > > Report information should at least contain information about test coverage and what rules fired and what not. Proposed format is CSV file. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3492) Create UX proposal to show/edit Test Scenario (Preview) global setting

by Amy Glass (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Amy Glass commented on DROOLS-3492: ----------------------------------- Adding some screenshots for [~zhutaojiajia] showing the existing properties for Scenario Simulation. !TestScenario_Cheatsheet.png|thumbnail! !TestScenario_TestEditor.png|thumbnail! !TestScenario_TestReport.png|thumbnail! !TestScenario_whole.png|thumbnail! Questions/ideas raised in meeting with [~danielezonca] and [~tirelli] -- 1. need a location for the user to view/edit configuration options that are added when the asset is created (for example, change the DMN file that is the source of the scenario) 2. consider moving the "cheat sheet" to another location as documentation -- another icon on the far right -- and replacing that with Options or Configuration header? 3. currently the two icons on the far right are "Test Tools" (contains Test Editor tab and Scenario Cheatsheet tab) and "Test Report" (see Drools-3486 for additional requirements for reporting) > Create UX proposal to show/edit Test Scenario (Preview) global setting > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-3492 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3492 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing > Reporter: Daniele Zonca > Assignee: tao zhu > Priority: Major > Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UXD, UXTeam > Attachments: 11unnamed.png, TestScenario_Cheatsheet.png, TestScenario_TestEditor.png, TestScenario_TestReport.png, TestScenario_whole.png > > > As user I want to be able to see/edit editor global settings. > For instance DMN file linked to the scenario or the Session name of a Rule scenario -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3486) Scenario Simulation: Export agenda info from session to a report

by Amy Glass (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Amy Glass commented on DROOLS-3486: ----------------------------------- [~kkufova] Since this one is labeled with UX and UX Team should we reassign this to [~taozhu] for the time being and then reassign to the developer once the design is complete? It is estimated already so perhaps this is back end work for the developer to do, separate from UX. But in that case, should the UX labels be removed? Sorry, I'm a bit confused. Thank you. > Scenario Simulation: Export agenda info from session to a report > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-3486 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3486 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing, Test Scenarios Editor > Reporter: Toni Rikkola > Assignee: Toni Rikkola > Priority: Major > Labels: UX, UXTeam > > Report information should at least contain information about test coverage and what rules fired and what not. Proposed format is CSV file. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-3492) Create UX proposal to show/edit Test Scenario (Preview) global setting

by Amy Glass (Jira)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi... ] Amy Glass updated DROOLS-3492: ------------------------------ Attachment: TestScenario_Cheatsheet.png TestScenario_TestEditor.png TestScenario_TestReport.png TestScenario_whole.png > Create UX proposal to show/edit Test Scenario (Preview) global setting > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-3492 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3492 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Task > Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing > Reporter: Daniele Zonca > Assignee: tao zhu > Priority: Major > Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UXD, UXTeam > Attachments: 11unnamed.png, TestScenario_Cheatsheet.png, TestScenario_TestEditor.png, TestScenario_TestReport.png, TestScenario_whole.png > > > As user I want to be able to see/edit editor global settings. > For instance DMN file linked to the scenario or the Session name of a Rule scenario -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.12.1#712002)

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira January 2019