April 2020 - jboss-jira - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (WFWIP-311) OpenShift XP image doubled its size to 2GB compared to 7.3.0.GA 1GB

by Ken Wills (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFWIP-311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin... ] Ken Wills commented on WFWIP-311: --------------------------------- The size difference is likely not relevant yet. This dev preview build wasn't squashed as It was built on my laptop with 5 other images, and in order to push the images to the internal registry in a realistic timeframe, I wanted to get as much reuse from layer caching as I could. When we do an OSBS build, OSBS will squash by default, and this will likely not be an issue. > OpenShift XP image doubled its size to 2GB compared to 7.3.0.GA 1GB > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: WFWIP-311 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFWIP-311 > Project: WildFly WIP > Issue Type: Bug > Components: OpenShift > Reporter: Martin Choma > Assignee: Jeff Mesnil > Priority: Major > Attachments: Screenshot from 2020-04-23 06-56-37.png > > > I have started to play with OpenShift XP image {{docker-registry.upshift.redhat.com/kwills/eap-xp1-openjdk8-openshift-rhel7:EAP7-1484}} and I have noticed it is nearly 2GB big. Used to be 0.92 GB for 7.3.0.GA or CD19. > Also strange is there is much more layers compared to several layers in previous releases > From dive output it seems every bash command result in own layer. Dive is reporting 624MB of waste space. > !Screenshot from 2020-04-23 06-56-37.png|thumbnail! > I am setting priority just to major because it is not official image yet. But if this will be the case of official image as well, I will raise priority. In OCP 4 there is no image/layer cache so image must be "downloaded" for each build from registry into pod. > [1] > {code} > docker-registry.upshift.redhat.com/kwills/eap-xp1-openjdk8-openshift-rhel... 1.93 GB > registry-proxy.engineering.redhat.com/rh-osbs/jboss-eap-7-eap73-openjdk11... 920 MB > registry-proxy.engineering.redhat.com/rh-osbs/jboss-eap-7-tech-preview-ea... 921 MB > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Guilherme Gomes edited comment on DROOLS-5268 at 4/23/20 8:38 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------------ [~tari_manga] I've removed the second item you've raised in favor of this new JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5269 Also, I've updated the term "variables" to "dependent nodes" (nodes in the sub-tree of the decision node with the Literal Expression). As I've mentioned in the chat, I think that anything smarter then that needs an intellisense service. was (Author: karreiro): [~tari_manga] I've removed the second item you've raised in favor of this new JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5269 Also, I've updated the term "variables" to "dependent nodes" (nodes in the sub-tree of the decision node with the Literal Expression). > [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5268 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-tools > Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png > > > In a DRG such as: > !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! > the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: > !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! > in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. > Please consider suggesting only "dependent nodes" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-5268: ------------------------------------ Story Points: 8 > [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5268 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-tools > Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png > > > In a DRG such as: > !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! > the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: > !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! > in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. > Please consider suggesting only "dependent nodes" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-5268: ------------------------------------ Description: In a DRG such as: !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. Please consider suggesting only "dependent nodes" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement was: In a DRG such as: !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement > [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5268 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-tools > Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png > > > In a DRG such as: > !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! > the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: > !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! > in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. > Please consider suggesting only "dependent nodes" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Guilherme Gomes commented on DROOLS-5268: ----------------------------------------- [~tari_manga] I've removed the second item you've raised in favor of this new JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5269 Also, I've updated the term "variables" to "dependent nodes" (nodes in the sub-tree of the decision node with the Literal Expression). > [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5268 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-tools > Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png > > > In a DRG such as: > !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! > the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: > !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! > in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. > 1. Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement > 2. Please consider if suggesting types is really necessary -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-5268: ------------------------------------ Description: In a DRG such as: !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement was: In a DRG such as: !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. 1. Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement 2. Please consider if suggesting types is really necessary > [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5268 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-tools > Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png > > > In a DRG such as: > !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! > the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: > !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! > in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. > Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5269) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Remove data types suggestions

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

Guilherme Gomes created DROOLS-5269: --------------------------------------- Summary: [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Remove data types suggestions Key: DROOLS-5269 URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5269 Project: Drools Issue Type: Enhancement Components: DMN Editor Reporter: Guilherme Gomes Assignee: Guilherme Gomes Remove Data Types suggestions from code completion, since situations where the user would need to reference the models type are very few and advanced. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-5268: ------------------------------------ Summary: [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope (was: DMN Editor smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope) > [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5268 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Bug > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Critical > Labels: drools-tools > Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png > > > In a DRG such as: > !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! > the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: > !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! > in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. > 1. Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement > 2. Please consider if suggesting types is really necessary -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-5268) [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope

by Guilherme Gomes (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Guilherme Gomes updated DROOLS-5268: ------------------------------------ Issue Type: Enhancement (was: Bug) Priority: Major (was: Critical) > [DMN Designer] Code Completion - Smart complete suggesting DRG not in scope > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-5268 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-5268 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: DMN Editor > Affects Versions: 7.37.0.Final > Reporter: Matteo Mortari > Assignee: Guilherme Gomes > Priority: Major > Labels: drools-tools > Attachments: image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png, image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png > > > In a DRG such as: > !image-2020-04-23-12-24-56-551.png|thumbnail! > the smartcomplete is suggesting symbols not in scope of the specific DRGElement: > !image-2020-04-23-12-25-35-386.png|thumbnail! > in my perspective this is quite dangerous, as it could very easily lead the user to write a wrong FEEL expression. > 1. Please consider suggesting only "variables" in scope of the DRG/DRGElement > 2. Please consider if suggesting types is really necessary -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (DROOLS-2965) No beta nodes propagation optimisation

by Mario Fusco (Jira)

[ https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ] Mario Fusco commented on DROOLS-2965: ------------------------------------- Forward ported to Kogito with https://github.com/kiegroup/kogito-runtimes/commit/875357c756df570af1b864... > No beta nodes propagation optimisation > -------------------------------------- > > Key: DROOLS-2965 > URL: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DROOLS-2965 > Project: Drools > Issue Type: Feature Request > Reporter: Mark Proctor > Assignee: Mario Fusco > Priority: Major > Labels: MDP_BRAINFARTS > > Where a rule has no beta nodes and feeds directly into the RTN that propagation should be done at alpha network propagation time, and avoid populating any unnecessary staging lists. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v7.13.8#713008)

6 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-jira April 2020