[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (BPEL-277) message parts with the atribute element won't be accepted by bpel

message parts with the atribute element won't be accepted by bpel ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: BPEL-277 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/BPEL-277 Project: JBoss jBPM BPEL Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Affects Versions: jBPM BPEL 1.1 beta 3 Environment: Running Java sdk 1.5.0_11, Jboss AS 4.0.5 GA and ant 1.7 in SunOs 5.9 Reporter: Felipe Jensen Casado Assigned To: Alejandro Guizar Wsdl specification allows the use of the attribute element or type to refer to the XSD definition of the part (Cf. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315.html#_messages ) However, when using the following definitions: <element name="EE"> <complexType> <sequence> <element name="usuario" type="xsd:string"/> <element name="sistema" type="xsd:string"/> </sequence> </complexType> </element> <wsdl:message name="pruebaE"> <wsdl:part name="entrada" element="tns1:EE"/> </wsdl:message> <variable name="entradaPruebaE" messageType="BA:pruebaE"/> <copy> <from variable="nombres" /> <to variable="entradaPruebaElectrica" part="entrada" query="/entrada/usuario"/> </copy> It will throw the following exception: 2007-08-28 14:45:28,291 DEBUG [org.jbpm.bpel.graph.scope.FaultActionHandler] handling fault: org.jbpm.bpel.gra ph.exe.ScopeInstance@1f8ab0d[name=<null>,token=/,state=performingPrimaryActivity,id=0] org.jbpm.bpel.graph.exe.BpelFaultException: org.jbpm.bpel.graph.exe.FaultInstance@4a1535[name={http://schemas. xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/03/business-process/}selectionFailure,id=0] at org.jbpm.bpel.sublang.xpath.XPathEvaluator.createNode(XPathEvaluator.java:100) at org.jbpm.bpel.sublang.xpath.XPathEvaluator.selectOrCreateNodes(XPathEvaluator.java:79) In the addressed part of XPathEvaluator, the following can be read: if (!(node instanceof Element)) { // cannot create node for a non-element parent throw new BpelFaultException(BpelConstants.FAULT_SELECTION_FAILURE); } This won't happen when using a type especification.