[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Wolfgang Laun commented on JBRULES-3514:
----------------------------------------
(WL8) Subsection 6.2
(a) Who is going to want an operator where you don't know the result?
(b) Given that "any A() -> any C()" has a "possible (!) result"
[A1, C1], why has "every( any A() -> any C() )" an exact result - "X1 =
[A1, C1], X2 = [A4, C3]" is presented as a well-defined result. (And why does this
only produce 2 results - there are A1,A2,A3 and C1, C2, C3?)
Add support to event sequencing
-------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-3514
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3514
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-api, drools-compiler, drools-core
Reporter: Edson Tirelli
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.5.0.Beta1
The purpose of this ticket is to centralize the discussions regarding the implementation
of event sequencing as detailed in the wiki page at:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/EventSequencing
The highlevel discussions can be added to this ticket while individual sub-tickets will
be created for the implementation of each sub-feature.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira