[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Edson Tirelli commented on DROOLS-2696:
---------------------------------------
[~uxdlc], looks good!
Question: are the extra fields dynamic? I.e.:
* when selecting Rules, the user may define session name and ruleflow name;
* when selecting DMN, the user may define namespace and model name;
* when selecting Process, the user has to define process ID (maybe something else, not
sure)
If so, then I think the design works, although, we still have to consider growing beyond 3
alternatives. E.g.: how about testing planning models? etc.
Dialog to name test and define bindings (UX)
--------------------------------------------
Key: DROOLS-2696
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-2696
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Task
Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
Reporter: Liz Clayton
Assignee: Liz Clayton
Labels: UX, UXTeam
Attachments: Add-notsosimpleA.png, Add-notsosimpleB.png, Add-simple1.png,
Add-simple1b.png
As a business user I want the ability to name a scenario test and define the rule
bindings so that I can create a test asset.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)