[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Wolfgang Laun edited comment on JBRULES-3514 at 5/23/12 2:19 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(WL1) Section 2, re the proposed construct "event <name> as ... [insert...]
end"
(a) As this creates and inserts a new event fact, based on a condition similar to a rule
and an implicit insert: it should also permit rule attributes?
(b) It is frequently necessary to retract the matched original facts - see the phone call
handling example. Consider adding a clause permitting retracts.
was (Author: laune):
Section 2, re the proposed construct "event <name> as ... [insert...]
end"
(a) As this creates and inserts a new event fact, based on a condition similar to a rule
and an implicit insert: it should also permit rule attributes?
(b) It is frequently necessary to retract the matched original facts - see the phone call
handling example. Consider adding a clause permitting retracts.
Add support to event sequencing
-------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-3514
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3514
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Feature Request
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: drools-api, drools-compiler, drools-core
Reporter: Edson Tirelli
Assignee: Edson Tirelli
Fix For: 5.5.0.Beta1
The purpose of this ticket is to centralize the discussions regarding the implementation
of event sequencing as detailed in the wiki page at:
https://community.jboss.org/wiki/EventSequencing
The highlevel discussions can be added to this ticket while individual sub-tickets will
be created for the implementation of each sub-feature.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira