[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-218?page=comments#action_12362617 ]
Mark Little commented on JBTM-218:
----------------------------------
Phillip, I'm not sure the tests I have on my laptop are able to show up much of a
difference. I've attached two more jars for you to try (jbossjta-ht.jar should be the
original jar, whereas jbossjta-sm.jar is one that uses a synchronized map). Let me know
what you see when you run your tests.
Contention on HashTable in
com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionImple.java
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: JBTM-218
URL:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBTM-218
Project: JBoss Transaction Manager
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: JTA Implementation
Affects Versions: 4.2.3.SP3
Reporter: Phillip Thurmond
Assigned To: Mark Little
Fix For: 4.2.3.SP4
Attachments: concurrent.jar, jbossjta-chm.jar, jbossjta-ht.jar, jbossjta-sm.jar
I'm seeing some contention on the object _transactions in the class
com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionImple. Most of the
contention happens in the getTransaction() method.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira