[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBRULES-614) logically asserted facts do not get retracted properly

logically asserted facts do not get retracted properly ------------------------------------------------------ Key: JBRULES-614 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-614 Project: JBoss Rules Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Affects Versions: 3.0.5 Reporter: Philipp Rechberger Assigned To: Edson Tirelli Fix For: 3.0.6 1) Setup the following rules: rule "#1: value out of range (verification)" when val : Value( value > 100 ) then System.out.println("found invalid value: " + val.getValue()); assertLogical(new Message("value out of range")); end rule "#2: value out of range (print out)" when Message( message == "value out of range" ) then System.out.println("value out of range"); end 2) Assert a Value fact that triggers rule #1 (note that the Value Bean provides Property Change Support for its "value" attribute): // assert fact - invalid value Value value = new Value(101); FactHandle handle = workingMemory.assertObject(value); workingMemory.fireAllRules(); => Output looks like this: found invalid value: 101 value out of range --- working memory dump --- class com.sample.Value: value = 101 class com.sample.Message: value out of range 3) Now modify the Value fact: // modify fact - invalid value value.setValue(102); workingMemory.modifyObject(handle, value); workingMemory.fireAllRules(); => Output looks like this: found invalid value: 102 value out of range --- working memory dump --- class com.sample.Value: value = 102 class com.sample.Message: value out of range class com.sample.Message: value out of range => A bit strange here: we have two Message objects - but this could be ok if both objects get retracted after modifying Value fact's value, so that it does not support the truth for rule #1... let's test 4) Modify the value fact again: // modify fact - valid value value.setValue(100); workingMemory.modifyObject(handle, value); workingMemory.fireAllRules(); => Output looks like this: <none> --- working memory dump --- class com.sample.Value: value = 100 class com.sample.Message: value out of range Conclusion: There is still a Message fact in the working memory that was asserted logically (by rule) due to the fact Value ( value > 100 ), which does not exist any more! The (second) Message fact must be retracted too OR logically asserted facts must be asserted only once (even if the according rule is triggered multiple times). Otherwise the statement in the documentation is incorrect (chapter 3.5.2): "assertLogical(new Something());" is similar to assert, but the object will be automatically retracted when there are no more facts to support the truth of the currently firing rule".