[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Radoslav Husar edited comment on WFLY-6634 at 3/14/18 9:13 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
[~rjanik] It's actually 3 WFLY issues (there is also WFLY-9860). With current process,
only whole features can be merged thus you are more likely to see more Jiras for a single
RFE. There is no reason why there would be 1:1 coupling RFE with upstream Jira. There is
very little to test within scope of WFLY-6634 as its not supported as a feature.
That being said, we can do whatever works best for QE, but I am just saying we cannot
create RFE for things that are not supported features.
was (Author: rhusar):
[~rjanik] It's actually 3 WFLY issues (there is also WFLY-9860). With current process,
only whole features can be merged thus you are more likely to see more Jiras for a single
RFE. There is no reason why there would be 1:1 coupling RFE with upstream Jira. There is
very little to test within scope of WFLY-6634 as its not supported as a feature.
That being said, we can do whatever works best for QE, but I am just saying we cannot
create RFE for things that are not features.
Add remote-cache-container configuration to Infinispan subsystem
----------------------------------------------------------------
Key: WFLY-6634
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFLY-6634
Project: WildFly
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Clustering
Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Final
Reporter: Paul Ferraro
Assignee: Radoslav Husar
Need to establish schema/model.
We probably want to create new capabilities for existing container/caches to expose
generic BasicCache/BasicCacheContainer types.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)