[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug...
]
Geoffrey De Smet commented on JBRULES-3083:
-------------------------------------------
@Kara Can you verify if this issue is still relevant on 5.4.0.CR1 or later?
If there is no verification that it still occurs on the latest release, we 'll close
this issue as stale in a few weeks.
DecisionTable incorrectly parsed with 5.2.0.CR1
-----------------------------------------------
Key: JBRULES-3083
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-3083
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Affects Versions: 5.2.0.CR1
Reporter: Kara Melba
Assignee: Mark Proctor
Fix For: 5.4.0.CR1
Attachments: decisiontable.jpg
5.2.0.CR1 creates incorrect drl from decision table. With 5.1.0.M1 the drl for the same
decision table is correct.
Wrong DRL from 5.2.0.CR1:
rule "ProcessState"
salience 65522
ruleflow-group "CompleteSubOrder"
activation-group "ProcessState"
when
$m:ModifiedMarker(processState==null, state ==null)
$s:SubOrder
then
$m.setIsModified(true);
$s.setProcessState(ProcessState.CREATED);
end
Correct DRL with 5.1.0.M1:
rule "ProcessState"
salience 65522
ruleflow-group "CompleteSubOrder"
activation-group "ProcessState"
when
$m:ModifiedMarker()
$s:SubOrder(processState==null, state ==null)
then
$m.setIsModified(true);
$s.setProcessState(ProcessState.CREATED);
end
The difference is that the constraints are put to $m instead of putting them to $s.
The attached jpg contains the decision table snippet.
The behaviour in 5.2.0.CR1 is the same for all decision tables in my project and prevents
me from upgrading to newer drools versions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira