]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-1170:
--------------------------------
How is this different from
Subgroups not consistent in MERGE_VIEW
--------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-1170
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JGRP-1170
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.8, 2.9
Environment: Linux, Latest Branch 2.9
Reporter: vivek v
Assignee: Bela Ban
Fix For: 2.10
We got two nodes and they are giving different node list in the same subgroup.
Manager node gets a Merge view,
2010-03-12 18:40:32,489 INFO [Incoming-2,vivek_cluster,manager_10.0.2.71:4576]
RpcServiceManager - viewAccepted()-> New View: MergeView::[manager_10.0.2.71:4576|80]
[manager_10.0.2.71:4576, probe_10.0.4.5:4576, collector_10.0.2.72:4576],
subgroups=[[manager_10.0.2.71:4576|78] [collector_10.0.2.72:4576],
[manager_10.0.2.71:4576|79] [manager_10.0.2.71:4576, probe_10.0.4.5:4576]]
see view id - 78, it shows only collector as part of the group. Now see on the collector
node,
2010-03-12 18:38:14,652 INFO [Incoming-2,vivek_cluster,collector_10.0.2.72:4576]
RpcServiceManager - viewAccepted()-> New View: MergeView::[manager_10.0.2.71:4576|78]
[manager_10.0.2.71:4576, probe_10.0.4.5:4576, collector_10.0.2.72:4576],
subgroups=[[manager_10.0.2.71:4576|76] [collector_10.0.2.72:4576],
[manager_10.0.2.71:4576|77] [manager_10.0.2.71:4576, probe_10.0.4.5:4576]]
View #78 was a merge view on Collector and it had 3 nodes. So, basically the new view on
Manager( view# 80) is showing subgroup (# 78) with different nodes.
How can we have the same subgroup with different node list?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: