[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1180) bi-pass JacORB interceptors for purely local invocations

bi-pass JacORB interceptors for purely local invocations -------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBAS-1180 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1180 Project: JBoss Application Server Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Components: IIOP service Affects Versions: JBossAS-3.2.6 Final Reporter: SourceForge User Assigned To: Francisco Reverbel Fix For: JBossAS-4.0.5.CR1 SourceForge Submitter: marklittle . I registered the following issue (http://www.jacorb.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi? id=526) with JacORB bugzilla a couple of weeks ago, but no response so far. I think it's sufficiently important to register here too in case you are able to do something for JBoss. In the current implementation of JacORB (2.2), if I register an interceptor with the ORB, then it appears that all invocations to all objects go through that interceptor, even if they are co-located with the invoker. I understand that rational given the PI specification and the original intention behind that work: to make local invocations and remote invocations similar. However, most ORBs provide a way of doing a local, no- interceptor optimization. The JDK 1.4 ORB is one example (though that takes the other extreme and won't invoke interceptors on any local object). Orbix 2000, for example, supports multiple ORBs and POAs within the same VM, and interceptors are registered on a per-ORB basis, not a per VM basis as appears to be the case with JacORB. You can also turn on local optimizations for the individual ORBs. The reason for asking for this optimization is performance. With a very simple test, where the interceptor does nothing, we see a 66% degredation in performance for local calls. For example, with no interceptors we can get > 3000 invocations, whereas with a "null" interceptor this is around 1000.