]
Liz Clayton commented on DROOLS-3393:
-------------------------------------
[~bdellasc] Personally I'm concerned the icon might be too visually disruptive, and am
hoping that the colors sufficiently passing the color tests might be enough?
Please review scenario error cell text for legibility/accessibility.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DROOLS-3393
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DROOLS-3393
Project: Drools
Issue Type: Task
Components: Scenario Simulation and Testing
Reporter: Liz Clayton
Assignee: Klara Kufova
Priority: Major
Labels: ScenarioSimulation, UX, UXTeam
Attachments: Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at 11.59.32 AM.png, Screen Shot 2018-11-30 at
12.05.50 PM.png, Screenshot from 2018-11-30 17-11-43.png
[~kkufova] [~bdellasc]
I noticed that the error text is a little "fuzzy" looking, the edges aren't
very sharp and I was concerned that it might not be legible. I asked Danielle about the
specs for it and it's the same size just bolded.
I did an online accessibility text using the following tool, with our current hex values:
https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/. It failed for level 3 compliance, but
I'm not sure we need to shoot for that or not? I tried the darker PatternFly red color
"#8b0000" and it passed at all levels, even at smaller sizes.
I'm wondering if we could use the darker red, in the non-bolded font? And if so,
perhaps the text would be a little bit more legible.
Just wanted to ask about this, please let me know what you think.