[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
James Perkins commented on WFCORE-4115:
---------------------------------------
I do believe Java 9+ defaults to G1GC, however the format difference is because of [JEP
271|http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/271]. That JEP reimplemented GC logging which leads to
the new format. In the "Non Goals" it states:
{quote}
Non-Goals
It is not a goal to ensure that current GC log parsers work without change on the new GC
logs.
Not all log entries will necessarily be reproduced in the new logging format.
{quote}
Essentially there's nothing we can do. We'll have to use a new parser.
JDK11 - GC logging format needs to be reviewed
----------------------------------------------
Key: WFCORE-4115
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WFCORE-4115
Project: WildFly Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Scripts, Server
Reporter: Marek Kopecký
Assignee: James Perkins
Priority: Major
Labels: Java11, jdk11
Attachments: java-11-gc.log, java-8-gc.log
* Weird naming of gc log files
** I test this with JDK11
** I start standalone and stop standalone
** JDK10 creates JBOSS_HOME/standalone/log/gc.log (with detailed information) and
JBOSS_HOME/standalone/log/gc.log.0 (with brief summary of gc logging)
** I start standalone and stop standalone again
** JDK10 moves original gc.log to gc.log.1
** JDK10 keep original gc.log.0
** JDK10 creates new gc.log (with detailed information) and gc.log.2 (with brief summary
of gc logging)
** Can this be changed by GC settings?
* GC logs are much more verbose against jdk8 gc logs. Can this be fixed by some JDK10 gc
settings?
This is follow up for WFCORE-3996
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)