[jboss-jira] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-6991) Still issue in 5.1.0.GA <database>-persistence-service.xml is dependent on ChannelFactory even on NonClustered

Still issue in 5.1.0.GA <database>-persistence-service.xml is dependent on ChannelFactory even on NonClustered -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: JBAS-6991 URL: https://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBAS-6991 Project: JBoss Application Server Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Everyone can see) Components: JMS (HornetQ) Affects Versions: JBossAS-5.1.0.GA Environment: Windows 2003 Server Reporter: Jeff Wexler Assignee: Howard Gao Priority: Minor https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6333 appears to still be open in 5.1.0.GA even though it was reported as fixed in JBossAS-5.1.0.Beta1 and JBAS - 6333 was closed. I recognize that I may have misunderstood the intentions of the developers on JBAS - 6333 for each user to find the instructions on the workaround here and make the changes themselves rather than for the workaround to be incorporated in the scripts in docs/examples/jms? If that was the intention, I would propose that it would be better to make the change in the scripts rather than requiring the users to find the work around and make the change themselves. I did not see how to re-open JBAS - 6333 and thus am creating a new issue in jira. The change to <attribute name="ChannelFactoryName">jboss.jgroups:service=ChannelFactory</attribute> instead of <depends optional-attribute-name="ChannelFactoryName">jboss.jgroups:service=ChannelFactory</depends> is still not in docs/examples/jms/postgresql-persistence-service.xml I just manually made the change to avert the Dependency "jboss.messaging:service=PostOffice" (should be in state "Create", but is actually in state "Configured") errors. However, other encountered other messaging errors when running the booking example using postgresql and thus commented out the attribute name="ChannelFactoryName">jboss.jgroups:service=ChannelFactory statement. Perhaps, this statement should be commented out in the original <database>-persistence-service.xml files?