]
Bela Ban closed JGRP-2418.
--------------------------
Resolution: Won't Do
See previous comments
Impedence mismatch between message types and transports
-------------------------------------------------------
Key: JGRP-2418
URL:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/JGRP-2418
Project: JGroups
Issue Type: Enhancement
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assignee: Bela Ban
Priority: Major
Fix For: 5.1
When sending a message (_of any type_), it is currently marshalled into a byte[] array,
which is handled differently by each transport:
* UDP wraps it into a DatagramPacket and calls DatagramSocket.send()
* TCP writes the array to the socket's output stream
* TCP_NIO2 wraps it into a {{ByteBuffer}} and calls SocketChannel.write(ByteBuffer)
In some cases, there is an impedance mismatch between the type of the message and the
type of the transport: for example, when sending an NioMessage (containing a ByteBuffer),
we don't actually need the conversion to byte array and the subsequent wrapping into a
ByteBuffer; this is superfluous. Even worse, when using off-heap, this creates an unneeded
memory allocation. Passing the *same* ByteBuffer all the way down from the application to
the transport would be better.
This requires changes in the way bundlers accumulate messages. Also, perhaps the
transport itself should become an SPI, to which a generic {{Transport}} protocol
delegates. This would also allow us to implement multiple transports (JGRP-1424) in the
same stack.